ImmuniWeb vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ImmuniWeb Logo
1,272 views|571 comparisons
Spirent Logo
615 views|391 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ImmuniWeb and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Testing (AST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ImmuniWeb vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent""After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing.""The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others.""I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status.""The solution's most valuable feature is reporting.""ImmuniWeb is stable.""The initial setup process is user-friendly."

More ImmuniWeb Pros →

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.""CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function.""CyberFlood is flexible."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features.""The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution.""ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests.""A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources.""The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions.""A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient.""Its technical support could be better."

More ImmuniWeb Cons →

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.""CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better.""The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes.""Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."
  • "ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."
  • "It is pretty expensive."
  • "It is pretty expensive."
  • "The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."
  • "There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."
  • "I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."
  • More ImmuniWeb Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
  • More Spirent CyberFlood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Top Answer:I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details… more »
    Top Answer:I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,272
    Comparisons
    571
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    615
    Comparisons
    391
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    225
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
    Learn More
    Overview

    ImmuniWeb is a global application security company operating in over 50 countries, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Most of ImmuniWeb's customers come from regulated industries, such as banking, healthcare, and e-commerce.

    ImmuniWeb® AI Platform leverages award-winning AI and Machine Learning technology for acceleration and intelligent automation of Attack Surface Management and Dark Web Monitoring. The data is later leveraged for threat-aware and risk-based Application Penetration Testing for web, mobile, and API security testing. ImmuniWeb is the only company that offers a contractual zero false-positives SLA with a money-back guarantee. ImmuniWeb’s AI technology is a recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, including Gartner Cool Vendor, IDC Innovator, and the winner of “SC Award Europe” in the “Best Usage of Machine Learning and AI” category.

    ImmuniWeb® Community Edition runs over 100,000 daily tests, being one of the largest application security communities. ImmuniWeb SA is an ISO 27001 certified and CREST-accredited company.

    https://www.immuniweb.com.

    Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

    Sample Customers
    Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...
    Digicel
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    ImmuniWeb vs. Spirent CyberFlood
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ImmuniWeb vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ImmuniWeb is ranked 17th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 7 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 26th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews. ImmuniWeb is rated 8.2, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ImmuniWeb writes "Easy initial setup process, but reporting feature for web scanning tools need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". ImmuniWeb is most compared with Qualys Web Application Scanning, Acunetix, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, OWASP Zap and Veracode, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our ImmuniWeb vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.