HUMAN BotGuard for Applications vs Imperva Bot Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Imperva Bot Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, F5, Radware and others in Bot Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Bot Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The tool's pricing is good."
  • "I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
  • More Imperva Bot Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Bot Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution seamlessly integrates with Azure infrastructure, making it easy for users to protect their web applications from malicious bot traffic. The integration process is straightforward. By… more »
    Top Answer:The solution employs device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis to accurately identify and block malicious bots, despite their IP address. With PerimeterX in place, users can successfully mitigated… more »
    Top Answer:One of the significant concerns with account fraud is the creation of fake accounts using stolen personally identifiable information. With PerimeterX Bot Defender, users are able to identify and block… more »
    Top Answer:The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution.
    Top Answer:I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. The price of the product also depends on the cost of the tools offered by competitors like… more »
    Top Answer:At the moment, I am okay with the product. I haven't found something that needs to be improved yet. I am not physically busy with any implementations associated with the product, but I will share the… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 17 in Bot Management
    Views
    606
    Comparisons
    520
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 17 in Bot Management
    Views
    353
    Comparisons
    347
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    PerimeterX Bot Defender
    Distil Networks, Distil Bot Detection and Mitigation
    Learn More
    Overview

    BotGuard for Applications safeguards your websites and mobile apps from sophisticated bots.

    Using superior detection techniques, hacker intelligence, and collective protection across the internet, HUMAN detects and defeats bot attacks and fraud with unmatched scale, speed, and precision.

    By employing insights that only HUMAN can provide, you will ensure that only real humans interact with your online applications and services.

    Distil Networks is the first easy and accurate way to identify and police malicious website traffic, blocking 99.9% of bad bots without impacting legitimate users. Only 41% of web traffic originates from humans, so it’s imperative to be able to detect and block automated attacks. Bots are the key culprits behind web scraping, online fraud, web application security breaches, content spam, digital ad fraud, and downtime. Distil Networks is purpose built to defeat bad bots that circumvent traditional web application defenses like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs). Distil makes your web applications more secure with API security, real-time threat intelligence, a 24/7 security operations center, and complete visibility and control over human, good bot, and bad bot traffic.
    Sample Customers
    theTradeDesk
    StubHub, Yelp, Glassdoor, DowJones, The Wall Street Journal, Whitepages, CrunchBase, AOL, Staples, Wayfair, EasyJet, Autotrader, Skyscanner, Orbitz, and Conde Nast, Amadeus, and Thomson Reuters, just to name a few.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Media Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government6%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bot Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, F5, Radware and others in Bot Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is ranked 5th in Bot Management while Imperva Bot Management is ranked 4th in Bot Management with 2 reviews. HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is rated 10.0, while Imperva Bot Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HUMAN BotGuard for Applications writes "They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Bot Management writes "A product that offers advanced bot detection capabilities and reporting features". HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is most compared with AWS WAF, Akamai Bot Manager, F5 Shape Security, Cloudflare and Airlock, whereas Imperva Bot Management is most compared with Cequence Security, Akamai Bot Manager, AWS WAF, Cloudflare and Fortinet FortiWeb.

    See our list of best Bot Management vendors.

    We monitor all Bot Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.