Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva Incapsula vs. Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
I like the user-friendly interface.
They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy.
This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment.
Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go.
Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this.
Setup was straightforward, very simple. I only entered the domain and Incapsula returned the DNS data that I needed to change for the protection to be configured.
On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user.
On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat.
Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way.
The dynamic profiling of websites is the solution's most valuable feature. The security is also good.
Data masking is the most valuable feature of this solution.
The solution is very scalable. It is one of the most important features. You can also expand resources and features as well.
There are some features that are configured by default, so even without doing much, it can still provide a level of protection.
It mitigates all of the availabilities of risks around web applications.
The compliance is the most valuable aspect.
It has threat intelligence and we are using Incapsula. With threat intelligence, we can separate HTTP and HTTPS traffic. We can use Incapsula to send all the threat intelligence to the WAF.
We would like them to hire people in Sweden because it's quite hard when people are sitting in the UK or Belgium because some of the customers really want them to be local.
Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments.
The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet.
Imperva now offers add-ons to add functionality, but I would like to see these included in the product, even if it would cost more.
I am not sure if this application has a policy where you can create your custom policy and run it as our firewall. We should have some ability to also create some custom policy, then run it as a firewall.
I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work.
I think that better bot protection is needed in this solution.
It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself.
Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved.
The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you.
It would be helpful to have a "recommended deployment", or even a list of basic features that should either be used or turned on by default.
Their portal is very limited and needs improvement.
It's a complicated tool to keep.
There could be some limitations that from the converged infrastructure perspective: when you want to converge with everything and you want Imperva to get there easily because it's not a cloud component. For example, when you want to build servers and you're using OneView to manage your software-defined networks, implementing Imperva right away is not that simple. But if you're doing just a simple cloud infrastructure with servers in there, you're good to go. Also, we are not able, with Imperva, to block by signatures. Imperva by itself needs to be complemented with another service to do URL filtering.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The data packages are higher than our needs so we end up paying for data that we don't use.
Although the pricing can be a little high, it is worth the protection and security that it offers.
The cost of this solution depends on the platform.
Everybody complains about the price of this solution.
Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately.
out of 39 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Average Words per Review
out of 39 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Average Words per Review
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Imperva Incapsula is a cloud-based application delivery service that protects websites and safeguards web applications and their data from attacks, and improves their performance by enhancing user experience. Incapsula includes a security platform with a web application firewall, DDoS mitigation, content delivery network, and global load balancer to maximize performance.
Web application attacks deny services and steal sensitive data. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) analyzes and inspects requests coming in to applications and stops these attacks.
Protect your applications in the cloud and on-premises with the same set of security policies and management capabilities. Safely migrate apps while maintaining full protection.
Deploy Imperva WAF on-premises, in AWS and Azure, or as a cloud service itself. Easily meet the specific security and service level requirements of individual applications.
Imperva WAF protects against the most critical web application security risks: SQL injection, cross-site scripting, illegal resource access, remote file inclusion, and other OWASP Top 10 and Automated Top 20 threats. Imperva security researchers continually monitor the threat landscape and update Imperva WAF with the latest threat data.
Learn more about Imperva Incapsula
Learn more about Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall
|Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.||BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens|
Financial Services Firm16%
Non Tech Company16%
Marketing Services Firm8%
Software R&D Company27%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm12%
Software R&D Company36%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider11%