We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"It blocks all types of attacks."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"The dashboard is good and user-friendly."
"IncapRules is one of the most valuable features, as you can create your own security and access control rules on top of your security policy. Using IncapRules we were able to easily block Layer 7 DDoS attacks several times."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"When configuring a web application firewall using Signal Sciences, we configure a rule whereby no one except a few people can access the application."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to set up the rules easily."
More The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Pros →
"It's quite expensive."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"Imperva always needs to adjust to new versions of cyber attacks, it needs to be faster, improve the resiliency of the software of the solution."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"Even if we create some custom rules, Signal Sciences cannot capture some of the malicious traffic."
"The areas that could be improved in Signal Sciences include the effectiveness of rules, as many didn't function optimally and required custom rule-writing to address bypasses for WAF."
More The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Cons →
More The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imperva DDoS is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is ranked 28th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) writes "A good solution to implement web application firewall for applications". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare, Akamai App and API Protector, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Imperva Web Application Firewall. See our Imperva DDoS vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.