We performed a comparison between HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Imperva Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is ranked 28th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 45 reviews. HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is rated 10.0, while Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HUMAN BotGuard for Applications writes "They ensure that our campaigns have run in the highest quality of settings, leading to savings on ad spending". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". HUMAN BotGuard for Applications is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Shape Security, Akamai Bot Manager, Cloudflare and Cloudflare Bot Management, whereas Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.