Compare Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Radware AppWall? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The compliance is the most valuable aspect.""It mitigates all of the availabilities of risks around web applications.""There are some features that are configured by default, so even without doing much, it can still provide a level of protection.""The solution is very scalable. It is one of the most important features. You can also expand resources and features as well.""Data masking is the most valuable feature of this solution.""The dynamic profiling of websites is the solution's most valuable feature. The security is also good.""Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way.""If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency."

More Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall Pros »

"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable.""Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure.""I like the concept of self-service, that I can do everything on my own."

More Radware AppWall Pros »

Cons
"It's a complicated tool to keep.""Their portal is very limited and needs improvement.""It would be helpful to have a "recommended deployment", or even a list of basic features that should either be used or turned on by default.""The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you.""Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved.""It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself.""I think that better bot protection is needed in this solution.""The user interface could be better."

More Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall Cons »

"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly.""Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."

More Radware AppWall Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Everybody complains about the price of this solution.""The cost of this solution depends on the platform.""The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors.""There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."

More Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Top Answer: If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors.
Top Answer: Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure.
Top Answer: Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers. Sophos and Cisco they have very good support, that's why they're able to sell large numbers as… more »
Top Answer: The solution basically protects the web applications of our customers.
Ranking
Views
5,482
Comparisons
4,400
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
536
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
1,285
Comparisons
1,041
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
400
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Learn
Imperva
Radware
Overview

Web application attacks deny services and steal sensitive data. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) analyzes and inspects requests coming in to applications and stops these attacks.

Protect your applications in the cloud and on-premises with the same set of security policies and management capabilities. Safely migrate apps while maintaining full protection.

Deploy Imperva WAF on-premises, in AWS and Azure, or as a cloud service itself. Easily meet the specific security and service level requirements of individual applications.

Imperva WAF protects against the most critical web application security risks: SQL injection, cross-site scripting, illegal resource access, remote file inclusion, and other OWASP Top 10 and Automated Top 20 threats. Imperva security researchers continually monitor the threat landscape and update Imperva WAF with the latest threat data.

AppWall - Radware's Web Application Firewall (WAF), ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical Web applications for corporate networks and in the cloud. AppWall is an ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, web application attacks behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP attacks (slowloris, dynamic floods), brute force attacks on login pages and more.
Offer
Learn more about Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall
Learn more about Radware AppWall
Sample Customers
BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, SiemensAccuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company12%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company27%
Manufacturing Company10%
Insurance Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business71%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise18%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,283 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 9 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 17th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall is rated 8.8, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall writes "Useful out-of-the-box threat protection, not too complex, and has good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Has good self-service features but they're not mature as an API solution". Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, AWS WAF, Imperva Incapsula, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb, Imperva Incapsula and F5 Advanced WAF. See our Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall vs. Radware AppWall report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.