• Home
  • Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. SiteLock

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Imperva Logo

Imperva Web Application Firewall

Read 45 Imperva Web Application Firewall reviews
8,226 views|6,592 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
SiteLock Logo

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews
432 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Stops bot attacks completely and has easy deployment
We were facing issues related to web servers and OWASP Top 10. We had bots rather than human traffic. We went with Imperva for a single-stack... Read more →
Anonymous User
Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security...
I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately."
  • "Everybody complains about the price of this solution."
  • "The cost of this solution depends on the platform."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."
  • "There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we purchase the license annually with no additional fees."
  • "There are a couple of different licensing models."
  • "The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."

    • More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

    • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring a...
    Top Answer:My recommendation is Imperva.
    Read all 8 answers   →
    Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
    Top Answer:For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
    Read all 3 answers   →
    DDoS solutions: Any other solutions to consider aside from Radware Defens...
    Top Answer:You can have a look to Imperva Cloud WAF, the anti-DDoS mitigation is under 1s and works very well. I observed a lot of DDoS attacks that were well managed (even not seen by the customer) by Imperva… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    8,226
    Comparisons
    6,592
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.7
    30th
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    432
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Imperva
    SiteLock
    Overview

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud. 

    The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Insurance Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 45 reviews while SiteLock is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Imperva DDoS.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.