Most Helpful Review
Use Tenable.io Web Application Scanning? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The compliance is the most valuable aspect."
"It mitigates all of the availabilities of risks around web applications."
"There are some features that are configured by default, so even without doing much, it can still provide a level of protection."
"The solution is very scalable. It is one of the most important features. You can also expand resources and features as well."
"Data masking is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The dynamic profiling of websites is the solution's most valuable feature. The security is also good."
"Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way."
"If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency."
"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."
"It's a complicated tool to keep."
"Their portal is very limited and needs improvement."
"It would be helpful to have a "recommended deployment", or even a list of basic features that should either be used or turned on by default."
"The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you."
"Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved."
"It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself."
"I think that better bot protection is needed in this solution."
"The user interface could be better."
"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."
"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"Everybody complains about the price of this solution."
"The cost of this solution depends on the platform."
"The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."
"There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
"The pricing is okay."
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: My recommendation is Imperva.
Top Answer: Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Top Answer: If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency.
Top Answer: Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product.
Top Answer: I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy… more »
Top Answer: I would rate it an eight out of ten. To make it a ten, I would like for there to be more flexibility for the testers.
out of 43 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Average Words per Review
out of 43 in Application Security
Average Words per Review
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
|Imperva||Tenable Network Security|
Web application attacks deny services and steal sensitive data. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) analyzes and inspects requests coming in to applications and stops these attacks.
Protect your applications in the cloud and on-premises with the same set of security policies and management capabilities. Safely migrate apps while maintaining full protection.
Deploy Imperva WAF on-premises, in AWS and Azure, or as a cloud service itself. Easily meet the specific security and service level requirements of individual applications.
Imperva WAF protects against the most critical web application security risks: SQL injection, cross-site scripting, illegal resource access, remote file inclusion, and other OWASP Top 10 and Automated Top 20 threats. Imperva security researchers continually monitor the threat landscape and update Imperva WAF with the latest threat data.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.
Learn more about Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall
Learn more about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
|BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens||IMDEX|
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm10%
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider16%
No Data Available
See our list of .