• Home
  • Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Imperva Logo

Imperva Web Application Firewall

Read 44 Imperva Web Application Firewall reviews
8,226 views|6,592 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Wallarm Logo

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews
380 views|315 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Stops bot attacks completely and has easy deployment
We were facing issues related to web servers and OWASP Top 10. We had bots rather than human traffic. We went with Imperva for a single-stack... Read more →
Anonymous User
Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us.
We added a real-time protection layer for all the web-facing applications and APIs in our CI/CD pipelines. As every one of the applications are... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Imperva WAF's strongest features are the detection of web application threats and vulnerabilities in the source code.""Very scalable and very stable firewall for web applications, with a good interface in its cloud version. Mitigation is its most valuable feature. The technical support for this product is also good.""It mitigates all of the availabilities of risks around web applications.""The WAF itself has been very valuable to me because it has such a complete range of features. Another reason why I like it is because it also takes care of the total overview of the traffic over the network.""I am impressed with the product's scalability, availability, easy management, and security. We were able to integrate the product with Azure and Sentinel.""Imperva is easy to use and deploy. The UI is excellent.""The most important feature I have found to be the ease in how to do the backup and restores.""The solution has been quite stable. I have not seen any bugs at all."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pros →

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

More Wallarm NG WAF Pros →

Cons
"In the past, I have bugs on the WAF. I've contacted Imperva about them. Future releases should be less buggy.""I think that better bot protection is needed in this solution.""It's a complicated tool to keep.""The solution works for particular zones but isn't always the best solution for all zones.""The tool needs to improve CPU and storage memory.""The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them.""The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you.""The user interface could be better."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Cons →

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

More Wallarm NG WAF Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately."
  • "Everybody complains about the price of this solution."
  • "The cost of this solution depends on the platform."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."
  • "There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
  • "There is a license for this solution and we purchase the license annually with no additional fees."
  • "There are a couple of different licensing models."
  • "The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."

    • More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good.​"

    • More Wallarm NG WAF Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring a...
    Top Answer:My recommendation is Imperva.
    Read all 8 answers   →
    Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
    Top Answer:For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
    Read all 3 answers   →
    DDoS solutions: Any other solutions to consider aside from Radware Defens...
    Top Answer:You can have a look to Imperva Cloud WAF, the anti-DDoS mitigation is under 1s and works very well. I observed a lot of DDoS attacks that were well managed (even not seen by the customer) by Imperva… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    8,226
    Comparisons
    6,592
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.7
    32nd
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    380
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Wallarm NG-WAF
    Learn More
    Imperva
    Wallarm
    Overview

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud. 

    The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.

    Protect any API. In any environment. Against any threats.

    Wallarm is the platform Dev, Sec, and Ops teams choose to build cloud-native applications securely, monitor them for modern threats, and get alerted when threats arise. Whether you protect some of the legacy apps or brand new cloud-native APIs, Wallarm multi-cloud platform provides key components to secure your business against emerging threats.

    -> Robust protection for the entire application portfolio

    Mitigate threats against OWASP Top 10 threats, business logic abuse, bad bots, account takeover (ATO), and more. Get the robust API protection that no other WAF can provide.

    -> Quick integrations

    Setup cross-team workloads via your existing DevOps and security toolchain (SOARs, SIEMs). Setup triggers and noise-free alerts in Slack and other messengers, PagerDuty, and more.

    -> Blocking mode and compliance with no hassle

    Forget issues with false positives. Wallarm’s new libDetection and core signature-less attack detection provide low false positives from day one.

    -> Unparalleled visibility into malicious traffic

    Gain full insights about attacks and attackers in the responsive Wallarm Console. Enjoy the Dashboard, reach search, and reporting capabilities.

    -> Automated Incident Response

    Reduce manual analysis and noise level. Automated Threat Verification can dissect potentially harmful attacks from millions of random scans and report vulnerabilities.

    -> Understand Your Attack Surface

    You can’t protect what you don’t know. Utilize the attack surface and shadow resources to track changes. Identify misconfiguration issues and vulnerable applications and resources.

    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
    Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Insurance Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 44 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.