Imprivata Identity Governance vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imprivata Identity Governance and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM).
To learn more, read our detailed Identity Management (IM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable functionality of the solution for us is that when employees stop working for the municipality, they are automatically disabled in Active Directory. Omada controls that 100 percent. They are disabled for 30 days, and after that time Omada deletes the Active Directory account. The same type of thing happens when we employ a new person. Their information is automatically imported to Omada and they are equipped with the roles and rights so they can do their jobs.""User-friendly solution.""We are able to onboard new user accounts much faster by automating the process and standardizing our operations globally. Previously, there were many individual processes and manual admin interactions. We also see a lot of cost savings and benefits because through automation and standardization.""The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements.""It scales in terms of numbers and types of identities. It can govern the on-premise applications as well as the cloud applications. So, it can manage hybrid environments with all types of identities and various load amounts.""We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to 30 percent of the time we spent on provisioning access.""The benefits of Omada Identity include a holistic way of viewing access, the ability to give people access, and automation.""The Governance and self-service that can be set up so you can use them yourself to work in the system are the most valuable features. End users can be enabled to help themselves."

More Omada Identity Pros →

"The most valuable features of Imprivata Identity Governance are automation and integration.""The most valuable feature of Imprivata Identity Governance is the integrations it offers."

More Imprivata Identity Governance Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do.""RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections.""With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.""Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros →

Cons
"Omada Identity has two main issues that need to be solved or improved the most. One is its setup or installation process because it's complex and cumbersome. I'm talking about the process for on-premises deployment because I've never tried the cloud version of Omada Identity. Setting up the cloud version should be much easier. The second area for improvement in Omada Identity is that it's piggybacking on Microsoft's complex way of having all kinds of add-ons, extensions, or setups, whether small or large, such as the new SQL Server, and it's cumbersome to make sure that everything works. Omada Identity is a complex solution and could still be improved.""I would like more training. As someone who is new to this world, I don't feel that the courses Omada provides are good enough. They should also improve the documentation. It is difficult to learn how to use the solution by yourself""The solution should be made more agile for customers to own or configure.""The comprehensiveness of Omada's out-of-the-box connectors for the applications we use could be better. We are getting a new HR system called Cornerstone for which they do not have an out-of-the-box connector, so we have to take the REST connector and play around with it.""The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""Functionality and usability could be improved.""If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI).""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides."

More Omada Identity Cons →

"The GRC portion of the product still needs improvement.""Imprivata Identity Governance could improve by allowing different permissions per application. You should be able to relegate what group has a certain level of access and another group has a different level of access. Currently, everyone has the same access. I believe this feature is supposed to be in version 7."

More Imprivata Identity Governance Cons →

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications.""Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs.""There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture.""The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help.""RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization.""Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is too high for SMBs."
  • "Omada continues to be very competitive on pricing, especially on the Omada cloud product."
  • "The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."
  • "It is licensed per managed user per year."
  • "There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing."
  • "It's a fair price for the on-premises system. Compared with what we had before, it's much cheaper and we get all the modules in one. We tried to go with the cloud, but it was far too expensive."
  • "From an on-prem point of view, the cost is quite transparent and reasonable. The direct cost is primarily for licenses and maintenance on licenses."
  • "My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware of how much the solution costs, but it's worth the money. Often, when you begin to use Omada Identity and it takes a while to set up, it'll be irreversible, and you'd depend on and focus more on the functionality of the solution, rather than its price tag."
  • More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Imprivata Identity Governance's pricing is probably in the middle ballpark."
  • More Imprivata Identity Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."
  • "We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."
  • "I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
  • More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10 to… more »
    Top Answer:My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not aware… more »
    Top Answer:There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Imprivata Identity Governance is the integrations it offers.
    Top Answer:The GRC portion of the product still needs improvement.
    Top Answer:We use Imprivata Identity Governance for account management and self-service password reset.
    Top Answer:With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.
    Top Answer:Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors… more »
    Top Answer:RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise. We have our own proprietary cloud… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
    SecurID
    Learn More
    Omada
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

    Imprivata Identity Governance is an identity management solution that is created specifically for the uniquely critical needs of the healthcare industry. Imprivata Identity Governance is part of the Imprivata identity and access management (IAM) suite of trusted healthcare solutions. It is a secure end-to-end solution with specific, finely-tuned role-based smart auditing processes, fully automated provisioning and deprovisioning, and intuitive analytics that facilitate quick risk evaluation and restoration.

    Users have the option of integrating Imprivata Identity Governance and Imprivata OneSign. Imprivata One Sign data can enable organizations to easily identify the best business processes to ensure governance compliance protocols, threat management, and role management policies are being consistently maintained. This will keep today’s business healthcare organizations running smoothly, efficiently, securely and fully compliant.

    Imprivata Identity Governance will ensure that healthcare organizations consistently deliver the highest level of patient care while remaining in compliance with critical government regulations such as HIPAA. Additionally, Imprivata Identity Governance will monitor any self-imposed corporate protocols, policies, and regulations to keep healthcare organizations protected from any potential financial or legal penalties. Imprivata Identity Governance will ensure that healthcare organizations are secure, compliant, and delivering the highest most efficient healthcare available.

    Imprivata Identity Governance Features

    • Self-service options: Imprivata Identity Governance users can easily update their own passwords or request new application access; there is no need to wait for IT approval.

    • Immediate access: Health care personnel can get immediate access to important clinical applications based on roles and job positions. Additionally, access can immediately be denied should job status or roles change.

    • Intuitive dashboard: Security analysts and compliance personnel have complete visibility of user behavior and access with detailed reports regarding rights, access, and other usage data.

    Imprivata Identity Governance Benefits

    • Cost-effective: Minimize overall costs with the automated identity management process.

    • Flexible deployment options: Healthcare organizations can choose between on-premise or in an Azure tenant. Users can easily utilize the benefits of the Azure platform for security and scalability to reduce on-premise resource usage and additional excessive administration costs.

    • User-friendly platform: Application configuration can be completed with a simple point-and-click process. Role management is made easy - users simply select and copy to make bulk edits.

    • Improved security: Utilizing strict assigned role-based protocols. Data security is safe and secure across the entire organization.

    Reviews from Real Users

    The most valuable features of Imprivata Identity Governance are automation and integration. We use Imprivata Identity Governance for our account management.” - Senior systems admin at a healthcare company

    RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
    Sample Customers
    Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
    Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems (EMHS)
    NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company37%
    Educational Organization11%
    Retailer7%
    Performing Arts5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise82%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Identity Management (IM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imprivata Identity Governance is ranked 16th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 22nd in Identity Management (IM) with 9 reviews. Imprivata Identity Governance is rated 9.6, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Imprivata Identity Governance writes "A highly scalable and stable solution that can be used for account management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing". Imprivata Identity Governance is most compared with , whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, One Identity Manager and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

    See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

    We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.