Impulse Point SafeConnect vs McAfee NAC [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and McAfee NAC [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Chong Dan
Use McAfee NAC [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For our tier group, for one year, the cost is probably around $10,000 for the license. If you do multi-year, you could get two years, and you could get it for about $8,000 per year. If you do three years, you get it around $7,000 a year."
  • More Impulse Point SafeConnect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    158
    Comparisons
    75
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Network Access Control (NAC)
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeConnect
    Intel Security NAC
    Learn More
    Impulse Point
    Video Not Available
    McAfee
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

    McAfee Unified Secure Access is the world’s first network access control (NAC) solution to unify endpoint and network security with access control and policy auditing. Unlike many existing NAC solutions, McAfee’s integrated solution secures against threats inside and outside the network while remaining simple, cost-effective, accurate, scalable, and secure. It expands your security posture with Adaptive Policy Technology that combines multiple assessment and control features into one NAC solution. It controls access and protects against broad threats with application-based and identity-based technologies, which control who has access to your specific critical network resources. Furthermore, Unified Secure Access protects your investment by leveraging your existing network and system components and taking advantage of McAfee’s integrated management through McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO).

    Sample Customers
    Aerohive Solution
    State of Alaska
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while McAfee NAC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC). Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while McAfee NAC [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas McAfee NAC [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.