We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."It is very easy to scale the product."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
