Compare Impulse Point SafeConnect vs. Portnox Clear

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
12th
Views
315
Comparisons
188
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
Views
143
Comparisons
69
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SafeConnect
Learn More
Overview

SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

Portnox CLEAR is a NAC as-a-Service solution connecting enterprise to its risk-based perimeter.

Offer
Learn more about Impulse Point SafeConnect
Learn more about Portnox Clear
Sample Customers
Aerohive Solution
Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 12th in Network Access Control while Portnox Clear is ranked 16th in Network Access Control. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 0.0, while Portnox Clear is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Aruba ClearPass, whereas Portnox Clear is most compared with Portnox CORE.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.