We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and Portnox Clear based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."It is very easy to scale the product."
"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
Earn 20 points
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC) while Portnox Clear is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while Portnox Clear is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform, whereas Portnox Clear is most compared with Portnox CORE and Aruba ClearPass.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
