Compare Impulse Point SafeConnect vs. Portnox CORE

Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 10th in Network Access Control while Portnox CORE is ranked 4th in Network Access Control with 3 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 0, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Provides us a good view of what's happening on the network and enables us to take action proactively". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and ForeScout CounterACT, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with ForeScout CounterACT, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and FortiNAC.

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Portnox CORE

Impulse Point SafeConnect

463 views|279 comparisons

Portnox CORE

Read 3 Portnox CORE reviews.

1,926 views|1,186 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Impulse Point SafeConnect? Share your opinion.

Principcon67

Consulting Principal at a transportation company

Easy to use with a convenient interface and helps us to quickly identify network issues

The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away. It is graphical, and we can see where the issue is,... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aruba Networks, ForeScout and others in Network Access Control. Updated: November 2019.

Download now

383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available	We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap.Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support. Read more »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th out of 22 in Network Access Control Views 463 Comparisons 279 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A	4th out of 22 in Network Access Control Views 1,926 Comparisons 1,186 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 892 Avg. Rating 8.3
Top Comparisons
Aruba ClearPass vs. Impulse Point SafeConnect Compared 40% of the time. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs. Impulse Point SafeConnect Compared 31% of the time. ForeScout CounterACT vs. Impulse Point SafeConnect Compared 29% of the time. See more Impulse Point SafeConnect competitors » + Add more products to compare	ForeScout CounterACT vs. Portnox CORE Compared 28% of the time. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs. Portnox CORE Compared 27% of the time. FortiNAC vs. Portnox CORE Compared 22% of the time. See more Portnox CORE competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
SafeConnect	Access Layers portnox
Learn
Impulse Point Video Not Available	Portnox Security
Overview
SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.	Portnox CORE provides 100% actionable visibility and control of all devices that are connected to the enterprise network. As a software-based Network Access Management (NAM) platform, Portnox CORE’s patented solution allows for efficient management of the security and compliance challenges that organizations face in a smart and simple way.
Offer
Learn more about Impulse Point SafeConnect Learn More	Learn more about Portnox CORE Learn More
Sample Customers
Aerohive Solution	EL AL Israeli Airlines, Channel 10 News, Wales Millennium Centre, The College of Management Academic Studies

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Aruba Networks, ForeScout and others in Network Access Control. Updated: November 2019.

Download now

383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.