Compare Impulse Point SafeConnect vs. Portnox CORE
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 11th in Network Access Control while Portnox CORE is ranked 5th in Network Access Control with 3 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 0, while Portnox CORE is rated 9.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Provides us a good view of what's happening on the network and enables us to take action proactively". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and MetaAccess, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Aruba ClearPass and Sophos Network Access Control.
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Impulse Point SafeConnect? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: July 2020. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | The vendor price is fair. The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports. We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap. Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs. 431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 428 Comparisons 261 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 2,464 Comparisons 1,420 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 918 Avg. Rating 9.3 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 43% of the time.  Compared 28% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. | Compared 31% of the time.  Compared 23% of the time. Compared 21% of the time. Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 3% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| SafeConnect | Access Layers portnox |
Learn | |
| Impulse Point Video Not Available | Portnox Security |
Overview | |
SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions. | Portnox CORE provides 100% actionable visibility and control of all devices that are connected to the enterprise network. As a software-based Network Access Management (NAM) platform, Portnox CORE’s patented solution allows for efficient management of the security and compliance challenges that organizations face in a smart and simple way. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Impulse Point SafeConnect | Learn more about Portnox CORE |
Sample Customers | |
| Aerohive Solution | EL AL Israeli Airlines, Channel 10 News, Wales Millennium Centre, The College of Management Academic Studies |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Computer Software Company26% Comms Service Provider17% Financial Services Firm11% Wholesaler/Distributor7% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.