We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Impulse Point SafeConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The most valuable feature is the blocking of USB devices."
"The threat prevention feature provides complete visibility."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, which does not require the use of an agent."
"We really like that we get full visibility of devices in the local network."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform it's highly customizable and flexible."
"Obtaining visibility into the network and connected devices is very simple with this tool. It takes me three minutes to do a base deployment when all the parameters are available."
"Provides a good overview of all devices on a network."
"The initial setup is quite simple. It's not too complex or difficult to set up."
"It is very easy to scale the product."
"Forescout needs to improve its cloud management and remote connectivity."
"Although Forescout manages endpoints and network devices, there is no capability for user management."
"Logging would be one area for improvement. When we're troubleshooting, there are not a lot of clear things on Google that we can look up for ourselves. When we have an issue with it, we have to call the company to get the vendors involved. The logging of Forescout is horrible compared to other things that we've used."
"Multitenancy should be included in the next version so it could be used as a managed service provider."
"The fact that Forescout Platform doesn't have a presence in the South African region is a weakness because of which you can't ask for help from them if you have any problems."
"When we automate an email to send to a user, sometimes it gets blocked, but that has nothing to do with Forescout. It depends on the mail gateway that we use or integrate with."
"The solution's customer support is bad and should be improved."
"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
Earn 20 points
Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews while Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC). Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis, whereas Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.