Imvision vs Salt Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Imvision Logo
115 views|70 comparisons
Salt Security Logo
1,567 views|1,280 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imvision and Salt Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security.
To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Imvision?
IgmarRautenbach
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues.
Top Answer:It is an annual subscription fee. It's very affordable. The value it provides justifies the cost, considering automation and availability features. Compared to other solutions, it's within a typical… more »
Top Answer:I've built integrations for different systems, and some specific integrations might not be built in yet. This might be an issue for large customers but is not a major concern overall. So, the… more »
Ranking
15th
out of 21 in API Security
Views
115
Comparisons
70
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 21 in API Security
Views
1,567
Comparisons
1,280
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Salt Security API Protection Platform
Learn More
Imvision
Video Not Available
Overview

With Imvision, enterprises are set to accelerate their digital transformation by making sure every API is individually protected, and every API call is scrutinized – no matter how many there are. It’s about making sure that every interaction between people, businesses, and machines can be trusted.

By applying an NLP-based technology, Imvision’s Anomaly Management Platform (AMP) is able to analyze the unique dialogue for every API, understand the application’s behavior, and model complex relations within the data. This enables to detect and prevent breaches, by identifying anomalous behaviors and breaks at the application’s business logic level.

The Salt Security API Protection Platform secures the APIs at the heart of all your modern applications. The platform collects API traffic across your entire application landscape and makes use of AI/ML and a big data engine to discover all your APIs and their exposed data, stop attacks, and eliminate vulnerabilities at their source.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Appsflyer, Armis, City National Bank, Coralogix, Finastra, Gett, Honeybook, Payoneer
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
API Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Imvision is ranked 15th in API Security while Salt Security is ranked 2nd in API Security with 1 review. Imvision is rated 0.0, while Salt Security is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salt Security writes "Provides visibility and control over all APIs". Imvision is most compared with , whereas Salt Security is most compared with Noname Security, Wallarm NG WAF, Traceable AI, Skybox Security Suite and Wib’s Fusion Platform.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.