Compare In-Webo vs. Microsoft Authenticator

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
In-Webo Logo
256 views|228 comparisons
Microsoft Authenticator Logo
4,901 views|4,070 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."

More Microsoft Authenticator Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It has been stable, and we haven't had any issues since we started to use it.
Top Answer: It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it.
Top Answer: Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications… more »
Ranking
25th
Views
256
Comparisons
228
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
4,901
Comparisons
4,070
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
380
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
PhoneFactor, MS Authenticator
Learn More
In-Webo
Video Not Available
Overview
inWebo took a different approach that prevents all 3 common 'flaws' of software+SaaS MFA solutions. We built our authentication algorithms using dynamic and random device credentials. The verification algorithms run within certified HSMs (hardware-security modules) operated in our multi-datacenter infrastructure. From a security standpoint, our solution is equivalent if not better than those 10 years ago. Yet, it also enjoys the flexibility, scalability, and convenience of a software+SaaS solution.

Microsoft Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices that gives employees easy, secure access to online accounts, providing multi-factor authentication for an extra layer of security.

Passwords can be forgotten, stolen, or compromised. With Authenticator, your phone provides an extra layer of security on top of your PIN or fingerprint.

Protect all of your accounts with two-step verification. The app also helps you secure all of your online accounts by using the industry standard time-based OTP (one-time password) codes.

Offer
Learn more about In-Webo
Learn more about Microsoft Authenticator
Sample Customers
Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives
Insight Enterprises, South Wales Police, Gwent Police, and Dyfed-Powys, Integrit, Turkiye Finans, Winnebago Industries, Globosat Programadora Ltda
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company21%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Frontegg and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: August 2021.
534,057 professionals have used our research since 2012.

In-Webo is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems while Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 6th in Authentication Systems with 1 review. In-Webo is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Authenticator is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Authenticator writes "Stable, easy to set up, and useful for people who travel a lot". In-Webo is most compared with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Fortinet FortiToken and Duo Security, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with Duo Security, Fortinet FortiToken, RSA Authentication Manager, Symantec VIP Access Manager and OneSpan DIGIPASS.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.