InAuth vs RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
InAuth Logo
166 views|161 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between InAuth and RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing for this solution is reasonable."
  • More InAuth Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    166
    Comparisons
    161
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    InAuth
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    In this new world of digital transactions, an elegant customer experience and security are no longer mutually exclusive.

    Businesses must adjust their digital strategies to incorporate real-time risk analysis and real-time decisions.

    Security measures need to align to keep up with the faster, “always-on” world.

    We ensure that you know and understand the trustworthiness of every device interacting within your digital channels – mobile app, mobile web, and desktop.

    RSA fraud prevention solutions protect organizations and consumers from online and mobile fraud, data breaches and identity theft, phishing, malware, rogue mobile apps, Trojan viruses and other cybercrime threats. It improves organizations' fraud detection and prevention capabilities, enhance their fraud intelligence, and provide secure consumer access, 3D Secure authentication, behavioral analytics and mobile transaction protection.

    Sample Customers
    Bain Capital Ventures
    Credit Union
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    InAuth is ranked 30th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. InAuth is rated 8.0, while RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of InAuth writes "Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing". On the other hand, InAuth is most compared with ThreatMetrix and iovation FraudForce, whereas RSA-EMC Fraud Detection Software [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.