We performed a comparison between InAuth and Sift Digital Trust and Safety based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."InAuth is a stable and scalable solution that supports many devices and platforms such as Samsung, LG, etc. It also has very reasonable pricing."
"It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process."
"The initial setup for InAuth could be improved, as it's not straightforward. Weak connectivity issues and user-friendliness are also areas for improvement for this solution."
"The user interface can be improved upon."
InAuth is ranked 30th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Sift Digital Trust and Safety is ranked 25th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. InAuth is rated 8.0, while Sift Digital Trust and Safety is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of InAuth writes "Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sift Digital Trust and Safety writes "Has a good 90-day POC but needs better machine learning and an updated user interface". InAuth is most compared with ThreatMetrix and iovation FraudForce, whereas Sift Digital Trust and Safety is most compared with Forter, DataVisor and Accertify Interceptas.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
