InAuth vs Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
InAuth Logo
166 views|161 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between InAuth and Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing for this solution is reasonable."
  • More InAuth Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    166
    Comparisons
    161
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fraud Detection Service
    Learn More
    InAuth
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    In this new world of digital transactions, an elegant customer experience and security are no longer mutually exclusive.

    Businesses must adjust their digital strategies to incorporate real-time risk analysis and real-time decisions.

    Security measures need to align to keep up with the faster, “always-on” world.

    We ensure that you know and understand the trustworthiness of every device interacting within your digital channels – mobile app, mobile web, and desktop.

    The VeriSign Identity Protection Fraud Detection Service, now from Symantec, provides a real-time, risk-based user and transaction monitoring system to combat account takeover and application fraud. The system monitors user and transaction behavior and compares it in real-time against enterprise defined policies and historic user activity. Activities that are inconsistent with legitimate behavior trigger automatic intervention to prevent fraud. This nonintrusive approach remains invisible to the consumer until suspicious activity is detected.
    Sample Customers
    Bain Capital Ventures
    Parshwanath Group of Industries, Vaibhav International, Veerkrupa Fabricators, Stratum Consulting, V-Image, Pabla Bearings, Palvi Power Tech Sales Pvt. Ltd., Star Enterprises, Madan Associates, Mody Chemical Industries, Neelam Industries
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    InAuth is ranked 30th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Fraud Detection and Prevention. InAuth is rated 8.0, while Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of InAuth writes "Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing". On the other hand, InAuth is most compared with ThreatMetrix and iovation FraudForce, whereas Verisign Fraud Detection Service [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.