Inflectra Rapise vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases.""It's pretty straightforward to set up.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

More Inflectra Rapise Pros →

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface.""The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Pros →

Cons
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability.""The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had.""It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

More Inflectra Rapise Cons →

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository.""There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."
  • "I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."
  • More Inflectra Rapise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.
    Top Answer:I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.
    Top Answer:Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    22nd
    Views
    254
    Comparisons
    143
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,079
    Rating
    4.0
    37th
    Views
    185
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rapise
    Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
    Learn More
    Overview
    Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

    OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

    Sample Customers
    - Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
    Migros Bank AG
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Educational Organization13%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.