We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Inflectra Rapise vs. NICE Robotic Automation

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's pretty straightforward to set up.""We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

More Inflectra Rapise Pros »

"It is easy to deploy. To do the automation in NICE, you really need to use your programming expertise. There are no inbuilt features in it, and you have to create all the required features, which can be very interesting for a programmer.""It is a kind of desktop automation. Its licensing model is a little bit different. It tends to be individual automation specific to a role. It excels at that."

More NICE Robotic Automation Pros »

Cons
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had.""It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

More Inflectra Rapise Cons »

"Its connectivity with other applications should be improved. In the version that I was using, it would just stop interacting with the other application. Its graphical interface should also be improved. It should have a user-friendly interface. Sometimes, people find it very difficult to understand. One of the obstacles that I faced while programming was that if I needed any kind of help, there wasn't much content on the internet. It can be very difficult to find a solution for a particular issue.""We haven't found it to be as powerful as some of the other platforms. From a true RPA perspective, it is pretty far behind some of the other solutions. It has emerged as a more desktop automation kind of tool, but it lacks a lot of enterprise features. It is not really a true RPA because of its licensing, which is kind of user-initiated. It would be nice it can be deployed at a more enterprise licensing model versus a user-based model. It didn't have autonomous automation so far, and they have just released this feature. They have kind of hodgepodged a bunch of products together to get there, but it is not as seamless as other solutions."

More NICE Robotic Automation Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

More Inflectra Rapise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"As per my understanding, UiPath has a much lesser cost than NICE, but I am not sure."

More NICE Robotic Automation Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases.
Top Answer: We pay for the licensing of the product. For Inflectra Rapise this is on-premises. The Spira Team is Cloud-based. While the subscription cost is monthly, we pay in advance for the entire year. The… more »
Top Answer: The solution is integrated well with the Spira Team. Even so, it would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and… more »
Top Answer: It is easy to deploy. To do the automation in NICE, you really need to use your programming expertise. There are no inbuilt features in it, and you have to create all the required features, which can… more »
Top Answer: As per my understanding, UiPath has a much lesser cost than NICE, but I am not sure.
Top Answer: Its connectivity with other applications should be improved. In the version that I was using, it would just stop interacting with the other application. Its graphical interface should also be… more »
Ranking
Views
430
Comparisons
274
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
959
Rating
8.0
Views
3,025
Comparisons
1,837
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
487
Rating
5.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rapise
Learn More
Overview
Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

NICE Robotic Automation is allowing organizations to reinvent customer service in the back office and the contact center. Automation offers an immediate reduction of administrative costs for a quick return on your investment. With robots able to perform tasks four to five times faster than a human, NICE Robotic Automation enables quicker turnaround times for customer requests and improved service-level agreements (SLAs). Routine processes are completed flawlessly every time, reducing the need to allocate time for making corrections. NICE Robotic Automation is highly scalable, so a center's processing power can increase when demand does.

Offer
Learn more about Inflectra Rapise
Learn more about NICE Robotic Automation
Sample Customers
- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
HelpLine, Telefonica Spain, Banca Popolare Di Sondrio
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Retailer7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise29%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. NICE Robotic Automation and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Inflectra Rapise is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while NICE Robotic Automation is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 8.0, while NICE Robotic Automation is rated 5.6. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "Enables us to automate functional testing of end-to-end test cases for evaluating the impact on the databases ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NICE Robotic Automation writes "Easy to deploy and lets you create all required features, but needs better GUI, better connectivity, and more online information". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Micro Focus UFT Developer, UiPath, SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Ranorex Studio, whereas NICE Robotic Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Kofax RPA and Kryon RPA. See our Inflectra Rapise vs. NICE Robotic Automation report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.