We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Inflectra Rapise Logo
430 views|274 comparisons
UiPath Logo
Read 163 UiPath reviews.
80,724 views|42,152 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases.""It's pretty straightforward to set up."

More Inflectra Rapise Pros »

"It's changed the dynamic of how we look at our processes and how we talk about why and how we do what we do. That's been tangible.""Both on-prem and cloud solutions are very stable.""The most valuable features are some of the panels in UiPath Studio. For example, there is a debugging panel and a Designer panel. The debugging panel is useful because without it we could not solve any problems. The debugging panel provides functionality such as Step Into and Step Out, and we have highlight buttons. It helps us to analyze our code, what is wrong in a solution, and debug from the start to the end, to make the solution better. The Designer panel is where we create a workflow or step-by-step process, the place where a developer develops the code.""You can scrape data into your tables, then easily transform it or convert it between formats.""The most important and valuable feature of UiPath is the ease of creating automations. It's a workflow-based model. End-to-end coverage is, no doubt, very important, because when you use a fragmented solution, the overall process flow becomes shaky. UiPath has the required capabilities to create an end-to-end solution for a business case.""The biggest benefit that we have from UiPath comes from using the API.""The Orchestrator is most valuable because we get work periodically throughout the day. It'll ebb and flow. We have really tight SLA, so we're able to have bots on demand. As soon as work shows up, the bots are picking it up.""It is easy and fast to convert PDF files to text documents and Excel sheets, which is important because, in my work, PDF automation is heavy."

More UiPath Pros »

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had.""It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

More Inflectra Rapise Cons »

"I could use more standardized features, retail-style, things that I could use off-the-shelf. Right now, all this requires quite a bit of adaptation in bespoke work with UiPath, which they've done very well. But looking at it after having used it, I would get stuff that is prepackaged from them, if they were any.""Improvement should definitely be made in the area of screen capture, where Adobe Flash is still being used.""Technical support needs improvement because it takes too long to escalate when necessary.""While I like the Academy a lot, it could maybe go deeper into some of the topics.""There are minor bugs. Every major software has bugs. That said, all are solvable, all are resolvable, and it's not a very bad thing.""To provide detailed analysis, there has to be some improvements so we can provide drill-down data to developers showing, "Hey, this has gone wrong." If they could also incorporate that as part of the reports, then it would be very quick to view on the dashboards.""The graphics could always be improved.""The Document Understanding feature should be more developed and advanced. For example, you have to make a template with their ML model. Currently, we can't use our own ML model, and we have to use the UiPath ML model. UiPath has only a few ML models right now. They should come up with more ML models or make it easier for us to use our own ML model."

More UiPath Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

More Inflectra Rapise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"UiPath is a good deal all round.""The pricing and licensing costs seem okay to me, although it is a little bit on the high side.""We analyzed and compared the costs of RPA from different vendors and we found that UiPath was the most cost-effective in the long term. An unattended robot costs approximately $8,500 annually.""UiPath has multiple plans that suit most businesses that want to evaluate the suitability of RPA in their company before going with full adoption.""Price-wise, it is not the cheapest one on the market, but it provides the fastest automation and the best training that I have ever seen for RPA, through the UiPath Academy.""I am currently using the Community Version, free of charge.""Costing and licensing were generally in line with expectations of this type of software.""Overall, I think that the pricing is reasonable and it is similar to competitors."

More UiPath Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases.
Top Answer: We pay for the licensing of the product. For Inflectra Rapise this is on-premises. The Spira Team is Cloud-based. While the subscription cost is monthly, we pay in advance for the entire year. The… more »
Top Answer: The solution is integrated well with the Spira Team. Even so, it would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and… more »
Top Answer: I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work with… more »
Top Answer: Yes, Attended Bots  which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.
Top Answer: Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Learn More
Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

UiPath is leading the “automation first” era – championing a robot for every person and enabling robots to learn new skills through AI and machine learning. Through free and open training, UiPath is led by a commitment to bring digital era skills to millions of people around the world, thereby improving business productivity and efficiency, employee engagement and customer experience.  The company’s hyperautomation platform combines the #1 Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solution with a full suite of capabilities that enable every organization to scale digital business operations at unprecedented speed. The company has already automated millions of repetitive, mind-numbing tasks for businesses and government organizations all over the world including approximately 50% of the Fortune 500.

UiPath was recently recognized as the top company on Deloitte’s Technology Fast 500, a ranking of the fastest public and private technology companies in North America, was recently featured in CNBC Disruptor 50, and #3 on the 2019 Forbes Cloud 100.

Learn more about Inflectra Rapise
Start Your UiPath Free Trial

Accelerate your digital transformation now with free access to the UiPath Platform

Sample Customers
- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
Airbus, Bank of America, Berkshire Hathaway, Chevron, CVS Health, DHL, General Electric, Google, Lufthansa, NASA, NTT, Orange, Philips, Singtel, Spotify, The Home Depot, Toyota, Uber, United Airlines, UnitedHealth Group, Wells Fargo
Top Industries
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company10%
Manufacturing Company6%
Healthcare Company6%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise29%
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise65%
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Inflectra Rapise is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 163 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 8.0, while UiPath is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "Enables us to automate functional testing of end-to-end test cases for evaluating the impact on the databases ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Starts ready-to-use, has good tools for developers, facilitates optimization of existing processes for significant time saving ". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Micro Focus UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio and froglogic Squish, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Kryon RPA and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.