Inflectra SpiraTeam vs PTC Integrity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Inflectra Logo
307 views|133 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
PTC Logo
2,745 views|2,150 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Inflectra SpiraTeam and PTC Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jorge Ambrosio
Neha Wanjari
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple.""The solution is fast and very accessible."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Pros →

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""PTC Integrity has good stability.""We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""Complete traceability as per process requirements.""It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks.""I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn.""The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

More PTC Integrity Pros →

Cons
"It would be great if they worked more closely with other solutions. There needs to be better integration with the platform for development purposes.""They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Cons →

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use.""To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.""The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields.""From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times.""We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.""The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product.""It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

More PTC Integrity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their… more »
Top Answer:The product is expensive. They should improve the pricing.
Top Answer:The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they… more »
Ranking
Views
307
Comparisons
133
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,745
Comparisons
2,150
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
218
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SpiraTeam
MKS
Learn More
Overview

Need to manage your entire project lifecycle? From requirements and test cases, to tasks and code SpiraTeam has you covered. Powerful, straightforward, and flexible, SpiraTeam helps you get started fast. With SpiraTeam, manage your tasks and bugs quickly and easily, sync them with your team, and get back to developing. Integrated version control, testing (manual and automated), and customizable reporting, help you track it all.

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Sample Customers
Cenduit, Maas Database Applications, DHHS Tasmania, Rota Yokogawa, ASI Business Solutions, ComputaCenter
TRW Automotive
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company42%
Manufacturing Company25%
Aerospace/Defense Firm17%
Engineering Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company25%
Computer Software Company16%
Healthcare Company8%
Transportation Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Inflectra SpiraTeam is ranked 21st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PTC Integrity is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 12 reviews. Inflectra SpiraTeam is rated 9.6, while PTC Integrity is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTeam writes "Great technical support with excellent integration and a fairly easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation". Inflectra SpiraTeam is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Codebeamer, Polarion ALM, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational ALM.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.