Compare Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jama Connect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jama Connect and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to reuse test cases already used across projects is the most valuable feature of this solution. We don't need to create new ones.""The user-friendly features are the most valuable. For example, migration of requirements and migration of test cases and the creation of traceability. You have various reports that you need. The plug-ins that are available to connect with the other tools.""The reporting functionality helps vendors and technical resources identify bugs and issues that need to be addressed. The simple dashboard-style home page makes training end-user testers simple and straightforward. The actual testing UI is VERY straightforward and very intuitive for the end-users that test the system since very often we pull from business and operational users to help test new systems."

More Inflectra SpiraTest Pros »

"Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful.""The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."

More Jama Connect Pros »

Cons
"It should develop integration with JIRA. We have some complexities which caused us not to decide to integrate it with our JIRA, like synchronous data.""Migrating is not very easy. It depends on the organization, how efficient and effective the decision-making process is. The plug-ins should be easier and more integrated rather than the user trying to integrate the tools which are more popular, like Jira et al.""The UI for managing test cases, test sets, test runs could be a little more integrated, currently, these feel disjointed at times and confusing. Also, the test steps page needs to display the test steps closer to the top of the UI so as to not have to scroll down to find."

More Inflectra SpiraTest Cons »

"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects.""t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information.""I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

More Jama Connect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,325
Comparisons
845
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Rating
9.3
Views
3,669
Comparisons
2,882
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SpiraTest, Spira
Learn More
Overview
SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial.
Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.
Offer
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTest
Learn more about Jama Connect
Sample Customers
- Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government
Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company20%
Marketing Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government11%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Manufacturing Company17%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise48%
Large Enterprise26%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jama Connect and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Inflectra SpiraTest is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Jama Connect is ranked 5th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews. Inflectra SpiraTest is rated 9.4, while Jama Connect is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTest writes "User friendly with ease of testing requirements management, migration from other tools and als othe integration with other testing tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". Inflectra SpiraTest is most compared with Jira, TestRail by Gurock, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Tricentis qTest, whereas Jama Connect is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion Requirements and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jama Connect report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.