We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"The ability to reuse test cases already used across projects is the most valuable feature of this solution. We don't need to create new ones." "The user-friendly features are the most valuable. For example, migration of requirements and migration of test cases and the creation of traceability. You have various reports that you need. The plug-ins that are available to connect with the other tools." "The reporting functionality helps vendors and technical resources identify bugs and issues that need to be addressed. The simple dashboard-style home page makes training end-user testers simple and straightforward. The actual testing UI is VERY straightforward and very intuitive for the end-users that test the system since very often we pull from business and operational users to help test new systems." | "It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level." "This tool can be used anywhere and on any device." "The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs." "The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards." "The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation." "The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications." "The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding." "This solution assists us with being able to quickly and easily start sprints and keep accurate track of them, including billing using a time-tracking add-on." |
Cons | |
"It should develop integration with JIRA. We have some complexities which caused us not to decide to integrate it with our JIRA, like synchronous data." "Migrating is not very easy. It depends on the organization, how efficient and effective the decision-making process is. The plug-ins should be easier and more integrated rather than the user trying to integrate the tools which are more popular, like Jira et al." "The UI for managing test cases, test sets, test runs could be a little more integrated, currently, these feel disjointed at times and confusing. Also, the test steps page needs to display the test steps closer to the top of the UI so as to not have to scroll down to find." | "The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable." "The user interface and views on different devices should be improved." "The plugin management needs a lot of work." "It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking." "The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat." "This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number." "The reporting needs to be improved." "The permissions can be challenging to get right." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "We feel that the product is a good value for the cost." "Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use." "To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money." "I don't feel that price is an issue." "It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams." "I am not sure if the client is using a commercial version. I think it is on a per-user basis, and it is around 15 Canadian dollars for a user, but I'm not sure. It also has a free version." "As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website." "We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software." |
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: Glad to see your post!!
In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is? |
Ranking | |
Views 1,371 Comparisons 869 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 626 Rating 9.3 | Views 69,667 Comparisons 60,798 Reviews 50 Average Words per Review 430 Rating 8.3 |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 20% of the time. ![]() Compared 14% of the time. ![]() Compared 7% of the time. ![]() Compared 7% of the time. ![]() Compared 6% of the time. | ![]() Compared 49% of the time. ![]() Compared 10% of the time. ![]() Compared 8% of the time. ![]() Compared 5% of the time. ![]() Compared 4% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
SpiraTest, Spira | Jira Software |
Learn | |
Inflectra | Atlassian |
Overview | |
SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial. | JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs. Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure. For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale. Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTest | Learn more about Jira |
Sample Customers | |
- Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government | Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi. |
Top Industries | |
Insurance Company20% Marketing Services Firm20% Manufacturing Company10% Comms Service Provider10% Comms Service Provider25% Computer Software Company25% Government11% Insurance Company7% | Computer Software Company14% Insurance Company13% Financial Services Firm13% Healthcare Company8% Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider16% Manufacturing Company7% Financial Services Firm6% |
Company Size | |
Small Business26% Midsize Enterprise48% Large Enterprise26% | Small Business33% Midsize Enterprise19% Large Enterprise49% Small Business12% Midsize Enterprise14% Large Enterprise74% |
Inflectra SpiraTest is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews. Inflectra SpiraTest is rated 9.4, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTest writes "User friendly with ease of testing requirements management, migration from other tools and als othe integration with other testing tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "Flexible and very easy to set up but can get quite complex". Inflectra SpiraTest is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis qTest, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Micro Focus ALM Octane, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS, Micro Focus ALM Octane, Rally Software and IBM Rational DOORS. See our Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.