Compare Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Rally Software
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"The ability to reuse test cases already used across projects is the most valuable feature of this solution. We don't need to create new ones." "The user-friendly features are the most valuable. For example, migration of requirements and migration of test cases and the creation of traceability. You have various reports that you need. The plug-ins that are available to connect with the other tools." "The reporting functionality helps vendors and technical resources identify bugs and issues that need to be addressed. The simple dashboard-style home page makes training end-user testers simple and straightforward. The actual testing UI is VERY straightforward and very intuitive for the end-users that test the system since very often we pull from business and operational users to help test new systems." | "Reporting is much easier and faster than Micro Focus ALM, with CA AC built on web services... Also, the data is more granular when it comes to tasks, iterations, sprints, and releases." |
Cons | |
"It should develop integration with JIRA. We have some complexities which caused us not to decide to integrate it with our JIRA, like synchronous data." "Migrating is not very easy. It depends on the organization, how efficient and effective the decision-making process is. The plug-ins should be easier and more integrated rather than the user trying to integrate the tools which are more popular, like Jira et al." "The UI for managing test cases, test sets, test runs could be a little more integrated, currently, these feel disjointed at times and confusing. Also, the test steps page needs to display the test steps closer to the top of the UI so as to not have to scroll down to find." | "One problem I see is that if there is a dependent user story - for example, if my team is working on one thing and there is a dependent user story from another team - we can have a dependency created but we don't know if there is a change of status from the other team. That is something which is very important for Agile Central to look into so that if the other team makes any changes we will be notified as well." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,371 Comparisons 869 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 626 Rating 9.3 | Views 8,823 Comparisons 5,737 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 631 Rating 8.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. | Compared 46% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time. Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| SpiraTest, Spira | CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM |
Learn | |
| Inflectra | Broadcom |
Overview | |
| SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial. | With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTest | Learn more about Rally Software |
Sample Customers | |
| - Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government | Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB |
Top Industries | |
Insurance Company20% Marketing Services Firm20% Manufacturing Company10% Comms Service Provider10% Comms Service Provider25% Computer Software Company25% Government11% Insurance Company7% | Financial Services Firm21% Healthcare Company16% Comms Service Provider15% Transportation Company10% Computer Software Company27% Comms Service Provider10% Manufacturing Company9% Healthcare Company9% |
Company Size | |
Small Business26% Midsize Enterprise48% Large Enterprise26% | Small Business9% Midsize Enterprise10% Large Enterprise81% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Inflectra SpiraTest is ranked 8th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while Rally Software is ranked 10th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review. Inflectra SpiraTest is rated 9.4, while Rally Software is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTest writes "User friendly with ease of testing requirements management, migration from other tools and als othe integration with other testing tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rally Software writes "Built on web services which can be used to pull reports and metrics without SQL queries". Inflectra SpiraTest is most compared with Jira, TestRail by Gurock, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Tricentis qTest, whereas Rally Software is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS and Digital.ai Agility.
See our list of .
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.