Compare Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The core business of Cisco Umbrella is non-malware. That's all it does: block the malware on the gateway.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability.""Using this solution has meant that we've needed to make fewer firewall changes.""The most valuable feature is that it secures our network against blacklisted or malicious websites.""The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.""It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.""The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"DHCP is a basic service, and they've been doing it for years, so it's mature and stable.""Infoblox offers granularity and advanced DNS protection to mitigate DNS attacks. It's a very secure solution.""The security of the solution is perfect. It's very good at protecting us from attacks."

More Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection Pros »

"The most important features for us are preventing DDOS DNS attacks.""With the model we have, we are able to scale very easily if we need to.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the granularity for which you can categorize what you want to block versus what you don't want to block.""The dossier feature is perfect for starting an investigation."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Pros »

Cons
"The solution's technical support is not very good.""Security, overall, can always be improved.""I would like to see DLP integration in the next release of this solution.""Support for multiple domains is important to us.""I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.""It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.""This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"The solution is expensive.""There needs to be more capabilities in order to configure the console itself instead of the user interface dashboard. Configuring the DNS or DHCP through the console instead of the GUI dashboard would be better.""There should be better alerts for when attacks are happening."

More Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection Cons »

"Endpoint solutions need to improved.""The dashboard and reporting features need improvement. The user needs more informative dashboards so they can get to the results directly without getting deep in the report to get to the information.""We would like to see more reporting capabilities that are now offered only with the on-premises reporting appliance.""The integration of threat intelligence with other solutions is challenging. If I want to expose threat intelligence, I cannot do it via taxi services. I have to call the API, but the customers are not into creating the APIs. The integration of embedded threat intelligence with other platforms should be better. Infoblox should work on this, and it should be easier for the end user to integrate it. It is very easy to deploy this solution. We should be able to integrate it with other platforms, such as the Next-Generation Firewall, with the same ease."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DNS Security solutions are best for your needs.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its simplicity is most valuable. I can install it and get it up and running, and it can be pervasive across my business… more »
Top Answer: It has a reasonable price. It is certainly not as expensive as it used to be. It is in line with other offerings on the… more »
Top Answer: The API is very Cisco orientated, which is absolutely fine if you're using Cisco Firepower and SecureX kind of products… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The dossier feature is perfect for starting an investigation.
Top Answer: The integration of threat intelligence with other solutions is challenging. If I want to expose threat intelligence, I… more »
Top Answer: Most of the use cases are for the DNS protocols. As 90% or 91% of drivers use DNS, everybody is concerned about securing… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
Infoblox Secure DNS
BloxOne Threat Defense, nfoblox ActiveTrust, Infoblox ActiveTrust Cloud
Learn More
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

DNS is one of the fastest growing attack vectors because it’s essential for network connectivity, and current security solutions are not designed to protect it. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) and other external and internal DNS-based threats can flood your DNS server with malicious requests, bringing down your network. These attacks can redirect users to harmful Internet destinations, exfiltrate data, and expose your customers and business to additional risks. Security technologies such as NextGen firewalls, IPS, and generic DDoS solutions do not understand DNS and are unable to prevent specific attacks such as DNS cache poisoning, DNS hijacking, reflection attacks, amplification attacks, and many others.

With Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, you can comprehensively defend your DNS server from the widest range of DNS-based attacks, while maintaining service availability and business continuity.

Infoblox DNS Firewall is the leading DNS-based network security solution which effectively contains and controls malware communications and prevents data exfiltration, thereby securing your assets and business. It also provides insights on threats, helps isolate infected devices for remediation, and stays current with the evolving threat landscape through an automated threat intelligence feed.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection
Learn more about Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Colruyt Group, Council Rock School District, Danone, GlaxoSmithKline, The Hershey Company 
Council Rock School District
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company26%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider24%
Government5%
Educational Organization5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is ranked 3rd in DNS Security with 3 reviews while Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is ranked 6th in DNS Security with 4 reviews. Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is rated 8.0, while Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection writes "An easy initial setup with DNS protection and good granularity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense writes "Good granularity for control and checks DNS queries completely". Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, EfficientIP DNS Guardian, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, F5 DNS Delivery and Fortinet FortiManager, whereas Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, TitanHQ WebTitan and Palo Alto Networks DNS Security. See our Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense report.

See our list of best DNS Security vendors.

We monitor all DNS Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.