We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs. TitanHQ WebTitan

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs. TitanHQ WebTitan and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy.""The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great.""It's very stable, reliable and does its job.""What we like most is security and how easy it is to integrate with other appliances.""Provides dependable DNS monitoring of external devices.""The initial setup is very easy and takes only a few minutes.""Helps block personal email accounts."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the granularity for which you can categorize what you want to block versus what you don't want to block.""The dossier feature is perfect for starting an investigation.""Infoblox has helped us improve in the way that we look at data as it comes in and out. We monitor and manage queries from every device that sits inside our company, e.g., every user, every laptop, and every query. When you type something into the web, Infoblox will scan or manage that. If it is going somewhere bad, then it will block them. From a metrics perspective, it gives us data, letting us go back and find those impacted or infected clients to either clean their devices or remove them from the network.""BloxOne provides automatic sharing of network context data, which affects our speed of threat response and provide real-time threat intelligence. Our security operations needs this to do their work. It makes us feel safer.""The reporting ability is helpful. It allows us to control what our users are able to resolve, and then be able to see reports on that.""When it comes to helping to detect DNS threats, BloxOne is good on all fronts. The number of false positives is very low, close to none. More than once it has detected new names or lookalike names and protected us and saved us from bad characters.""The automatic blocklists are most valuable. A box can maintain several lists from which we can choose if we need to block more or less. We don't have to manually manage the lists ourselves. They're automatically updated.""Our ability to detect data exfiltration was minimal before Infoblox and the cloud portal was instituted for us. In terms of DNS security as a whole, we had some capability with our firewalls, but this is a lot more specialized because we're sending all of our DNS requests to Infoblox. I'd say we improved 100%."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Pros »

"The solution offers very good self-authentication. It has a lot of protocols and ways to authenticate users by ID, or by Active Directory Integration. It's able to take credentials from the Active Directory Domain Controllers.""The web content filter is the most valuable feature."

More TitanHQ WebTitan Pros »

Cons
"This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.""The reporting could be improved by way of the information that's displayed. For example, when you pull a report, it shows an internal employee going to many websites, but you can spin that right down by saying a lot of it is being cached.""It has happened in the past that Cisco Umbrella has denied us access to secure websites.""In the next release, I would like to see the integration of VDI NSX with Cisco Umbrella.""They need to improve analytics so they report on more of the specifics of user activity.""Missing a real data leakage prevention solution.""Data reporting could be improved."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"We would like to see more reporting capabilities that are now offered only with the on-premises reporting appliance.""The integration of threat intelligence with other solutions is challenging. If I want to expose threat intelligence, I cannot do it via taxi services. I have to call the API, but the customers are not into creating the APIs. The integration of embedded threat intelligence with other platforms should be better. Infoblox should work on this, and it should be easier for the end user to integrate it. It is very easy to deploy this solution. We should be able to integrate it with other platforms, such as the Next-Generation Firewall, with the same ease.""A lot of their documentation needs improvement.""Within the past two years, we discovered certain bugs in their products. The resolution of these bugs took a little too much time, especially if our production environment is down for a certain amount of time, then we are losing money. That is hard to convey to Infoblox support, e.g., we actually need the system up and running again within two or three hours. The awareness of these so-called production down incidents is not really easy to convey.""The documentation needs to be improved because there are a lot of different models that it can be deployed in, and it's somewhat confusing determining what you need and how to set it up to best cover your use cases.""The research side and the reporting side need improvement. Both of those are items on the menu. They could use a little bit of cleanup to make their respective information more easily understood.""The onboarding is a little rough at times, and you need to have some information at hand. It is pretty good, but it would be useful to have a few good examples to set up things like data exfiltration.""This is not just Infoblox, this could be any portal provider, cloud provider, sometimes they change the look of the customer-facing options and it's not completely clear why they make the change."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Cons »

"There are some small bugs in the real-time login environment. There is a real-time login and you can see which URLs are blocked or allowed for every user. They should make sure this is resolved in future releases.""The Oauth1 protocol has a lot of issues with authentication and it made it very difficult to initially authenticate with the API."

More TitanHQ WebTitan Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible.""There are three models for licensing with different feature sets.""I think it's worth the money.""The price of Cisco Umbrella is a little higher than similar solutions, like Gateway.""The price should be slightly lower than the current price because if you look at the whole solution, it is simply a threat intelligence solution to block blacklisted things. The price should be lower looking at the features provided by the solution. The price isn't too high either, but it could be lower.""There is a subscription cost."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment.""When you buy the subscription, there are no additional costs to add any additional buttons.""Infoblox BloxOne offers pretty good documentation. Check its documentation, then do a PoC. Infoblox is very good at providing PoCs.""There is a significant charge for this product but I think that it's worth it when we look at what it's able to prevent.""It is a very expensive system. You need to go over the licensing before purchase to make sure you're getting what is needed, not anything extra."

More Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies."

More TitanHQ WebTitan Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  Cisco Umbrella and Zscaler Internet Access are two broad-spectrum Internet security solutions that I have tried.… more »
Top Answer: I like that it integrates with the infrastructure. I also like the kind of data and intelligence that's built-in. It… more »
Top Answer: The price depends on the use case, and it's a bit linear. But it depends on the customer's strategy and how Cisco plans… more »
Top Answer: Our ability to detect data exfiltration was minimal before Infoblox and the cloud portal was instituted for us. In terms… more »
Top Answer: It is a very expensive system. You need to go over the licensing before purchase to make sure you're getting what is… more »
Top Answer: This is not just Infoblox, this could be any portal provider, cloud provider, sometimes they change the look of the… more »
Top Answer: The web content filter is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies. I would suggest doing your… more »
Top Answer: The Oauth1 protocol has a lot of issues with authentication and it made it very difficult to initially authenticate with… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
BloxOne Threat Defense, nfoblox ActiveTrust, Infoblox ActiveTrust Cloud
WebTitan, WebTitan Web Filter
Learn More
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense strengthens and optimizes your security posture from the foundation up, giving you the visibility, control and automation to secure the hybrid workplace. Operating at the DNS level, BloxOne Threat Defense uncovers threats that other solutions do not and stops attacks earlier in the threat lifecycle. Through pervasive automation and ecosystem integration, it drives efficiencies in SecOps, increases the effectiveness of the existing security stack, secures digital and work-from-anywhere efforts and lowers the total cost for cybersecurity.

WebTitan is a powerful web filter providing protection from web based security threats and advanced web and dns filtering control to businesses around the world. WebTitan Cloud is a DNS based web filtering solution, hosted and managed by TitanHQ in our shared cloud environment. This cloud based dns web filtering solution provides complete protection from online threats such as viruses, malware, ransomware, phishing and comprehensive content filtering. WebTitan Cloud is a low maintenance solution that can be set up in five minutes to stop your users from accessing inappropriate content online. Our intelligent content categorization combines industry leading anti-virus and cloud based architecture. This makes the WebTitan Cloud DNS filter an ideal solution for organizations needing maximum protection and minimal maintenance.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense
Learn more about TitanHQ WebTitan
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Council Rock School District, EagleView, Schneider Electric, Baptist Memorial Health Care, American University
Clarks, Pepsi, Purple, Comcast, Virgin, McDonalds, Sprint, Adtran, Xirrus, Eir, ViaSat
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company26%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider26%
Construction Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise34%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs. TitanHQ WebTitan and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
543,424 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is ranked 2nd in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 8 reviews while TitanHQ WebTitan is ranked 3rd in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 2 reviews. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is rated 8.6, while TitanHQ WebTitan is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense writes "Does a good job of identifying any threats in terms of data exfiltration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TitanHQ WebTitan writes "Easy to implement, lots of filtering options and very stable". Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security and Akamai Enterprise Threat Protector, whereas TitanHQ WebTitan is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, DNSFilter, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, Barracuda Web Security Gateway and iboss. See our Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs. TitanHQ WebTitan report.

See our list of best Domain Name System (DNS) Security vendors.

We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.