Infobright DB vs. MySQL

As of June 2019, Infobright DB is ranked 8th in Relational Databases with 5 reviews vs MySQL which is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 35 reviews. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Offers a simple DBMS solution with a very low hardware footprint. Only one of the engines supports ACID transaction control". Infobright DB is most compared with Pivotal Greenplum, Vertica and Citus Data. MySQL is most compared with CockroachDB, Firebird SQL and Oracle Database. See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infobright DB Logo
3,519 views|543 comparisons
MySQL Logo
Read 35 MySQL reviews.
20,890 views|10,882 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
347,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows

Read more »

It creates a unified view of the entire architecture and performance factor, helping to manage the network more easily.It has a remote access feature to manage the database from a remote location. This enables in-work collaboration.I use MySQL for employee service in an OLTP database.Support for enterprise-grade features like clustering, master-slave replication, even Sharding (to some extent) which is an advanced feature.​The most valuable feature of MySQL is the informative error outputs of command line interface.​​We use MySQL for enterprise data storage as well as part of the back-end of websites and web applications.​Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run.​A lot of the software components have been trialed and tested for often more than 10 years.

Read more »

Cons
Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk.

Read more »

The only service which could be improved is its usability. The entire user experience needs to be revamped to meet the 2018 design standards.When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version.I feel that some tools which make it easier to create queries or make it easier for other functions would be really interesting to see.Some problems with big table operations, and a struggle to keep the servers responding in peak situations.It would be helpful if there were a graphical user interface to administer, configure, and tune it.If it had something similar to Microsoft’s DTS engine then it would be the best database system out there.​MySQL needs improvements on its diagnostic features.​​MySQL is not easily scalable on cost effective consumer grade hardware.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up.MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around.​Enterprise editions and support are definitely needed for the heavy users who need direct support. ​When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
347,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
8th
Views
3,519
Comparisons
543
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
426
Avg. Rating
7.1
3rd
Views
20,890
Comparisons
10,882
Reviews
33
Average Words per Review
337
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Infobright
Learn
Ignite Technologies
Oracle
Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

Offer
Learn more about Infobright DB
Learn more about MySQL
Sample Customers
REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
347,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email