We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and Oracle Database In-Memory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"The product offers high scalability."
"The solution's ROI is excellent."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
"I like Oracle because it is a backward-compatible solution."
"We use the tool for real-time data transfer for risk management purposes. In a trading system, conversions happen fast. We use the product to handle fast transactions with low latency."
"The scalability is very good."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"The query optimization and backup features should be added."
"We often have to find solutions on our own through the support site, so there's room for improvement in this regard."
"Oracle Database In-Memory appliance-based solutions can be restrictive for some applications, as they may require more flexibility in the database design to be tuned and sized to the customer's needs."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."
"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 26 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server and MariaDB.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.