Compare Infobright DB vs. SAP HANA

Infobright DB is ranked 19th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 5th in Relational Databases with 9 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 4.6, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". Infobright DB is most compared with Pivotal Greenplum, Vertica and MySQL, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database and Teradata. See our Infobright DB vs. SAP HANA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infobright DB Logo
1,062 views|507 comparisons
SAP HANA Logo
10,328 views|8,438 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows

Read more »

The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database.The functionality is of the solution is very good.One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory.Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for.The most value for us was in terms of using it to issue tenders online. We host our server, but it is open to the public, so clients who want to buy those tenders were able to go online, put their tender documents up, and we could evaluate them using SAP.If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy.This solution is very fast.It has a very huge bandwidth and data transfer.

Read more »

Cons
Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk.

Read more »

I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement.The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help.If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great.FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM.The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it.In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies.The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital.The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
1,062
Comparisons
507
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
590
Avg. Rating
4.5
5th
Views
10,328
Comparisons
8,438
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
425
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
InfobrightSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn
Ignite Technologies
SAP
Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about Infobright DB
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, BangoUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer7%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email