Compare Infobright DB vs. Teradata

Infobright DB is ranked 19th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews while Teradata is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 12 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 4.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries". Infobright DB is most compared with Pivotal Greenplum, Vertica and MySQL, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Exadata and Amazon Redshift. See our Infobright DB vs. Teradata report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infobright DB Logo
1,062 views|507 comparisons
Teradata Logo
19,870 views|15,334 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows

Read more »

The most valuable features are the Shared-nothing architecture and data protection functionality.The feature that we find most valuable is its ability to perform Massive Parallel Processing.It handles large amounts of information with a linear performance increase, in relation to a HW investment.It has a solid set of tools and consulting services.It has massive parallel processing ability to do large amounts of concurrent querying.It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs.Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries.A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts.

Read more »

Cons
Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk.

Read more »

The user interface needs to be improved.I would like to see an improved Knowledge Base on the web.It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI.We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata.There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system.Query language and its functionality are rather limited, compared to Oracle or even SQL Server. However, it is possible to perform any kind of logic in it (though some workarounds may be required).Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect.Needs compatibility with more Big Data platforms.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space.We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise.Price is quite high, so if it is really possible to use other solutions (e.g. you do not have strict requirements for performance and huge data volumes), it might be better to look at alternatives from the RDBMS world.Teradata is expensive but gives value for money, especially if you don't want to move your data to the cloud.It is still a very expensive solution. While I very much like the pure technological supremacy of the software itself, I believe Teradata as a company needs to become more affordable. They are already losing the market to more flexible or cheaper competitors.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
1,062
Comparisons
507
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
590
Avg. Rating
4.5
3rd
Views
19,870
Comparisons
15,334
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
228
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Infobright
Learn
Ignite Technologies
Teradata
Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

Offer
Learn more about Infobright DB
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, BangoNetflix
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider43%
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Financial Services Firm14%
Media Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email