Infobright vs. Oracle Database

Infobright is ranked 9th in Relational Databases with 7 reviews vs Oracle Database which is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 32 reviews. The top reviewer of Infobright writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". The top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Enables us to combine all the sophisticated architectures in the market". Infobright is most compared with Vertica, Pivotal Greenplum and MySQL. Oracle Database is most compared with IBM Db2, SQL Server and Tibero. See our Infobright vs. Oracle Database report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright vs. Oracle Database and others in Relational Databases.
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Infobright vs. Oracle Database

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows

Read more »

I really appreciate the performance of Oracle. When using AWR records you can really see where a problem is. You can get advice about which queries are the heaviest for the database. You also can see advice for indexes. If an index isn't used, then you can just remove it to improve performance. This is a really good feature. Also, the JDBC connection is quite good. Finally, the object types are really good, the types of tables you can use in PL/SQL are also really helpful.Using the product, we make less mistakes, are more organized and faster than if we did it any another way.Compared to other databases, Oracle Database is very simple to manage in terms of the database itself.It stores a lot of data in a short time.It is flexible, scalable, and a true Enterprise RDBMS.High availability using real application clusters.It gives DB consistency, supports disaster recovery (DR), is tunable, and handles large DB sizes.You can install Oracle Database software, patching, and create/configure Oracle databases in silent using scripts

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk.

Read more »

There are a lot of bugs in the Oracle Database, and it would be better if the bugs would be solved more quickly than they are today.In general, the support is not good since most of the time the person whom you are given to is not so professional.Integration with big data would be helpful since we are planning to load a lot of big data.A lot of features have bugs or choose the wrong way to process data.Auditing could be improved, especially granular auditing. The unified audit trail in 12c is great, however its extraction in a highly busy environment is quite a challenge.The compression does not give much value-add or provide performance benefits as was highlighted.Cloud installations using Oracle are not supported by SAP.​​​Upgrade is the most critical phase for the lifecycle of a database. In order to be sure that the migration succeeds, you need to be up-to-date. Therefore, regularly install the patchset and security updates.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

The price is very expensive for the support.The main issue where I feel that Oracle still has a problem is with the licensing. Licensing is still expensive and the reason why today most startups use other, cheaper databases. Those other databases are much less sophisticated than Oracle.​The license cost need to be optimized. The licensing cost is very high compared to other RDBMS.Be prepared to pay for consulting services, and do not underestimate the time required to find and hire good quality database administrators.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,256
Comparisons
655
Reviews
7
Followers
155
Avg. Rating
7.1
Views
33,920
Comparisons
9,192
Reviews
34
Followers
489
Avg. Rating
8.6
Unranked
In Relational Databases
Top Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Infobright competitors »
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Oracle Database competitors »
Compared 29% of the time.
Also Known As
Oracle 12c, RDBMS
Learn how it works
Ignite Technologies
Oracle
Null Vendor
Video Not Available
Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Infobright
Learn more about Oracle Database
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, BangoAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
32%
Media Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Newspaper
6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
25%
Media Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
70%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
27%
Large Enterprise
39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
58%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright vs. Oracle Database and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
306,037 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email