• Home
  • Infobright DB vs. SAND [EOL]

Infobright DB vs SAND [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ignite Technologies Logo

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews
66 views|48 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
SAND Technology Logo

SAND [EOL]

views| comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Data Warehouse
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and SAND [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Steve Dodge
If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.
When working properly, the ability to continually insert large datasets, millions of records per minute, while simultaneously querying the same... Read more →
Use SAND [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

    • More Infobright DB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    66
    Comparisons
    48
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Data Warehouse
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Warehouse
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Infobright
    Learn More
    Ignite Technologies
    SAND Technology
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

    SAND delivers a world class performing Enterprise Analytic Database Platform. The SAND Platform is a patented columnar database management system (CDBMS), delivering optimal performance for every user. Generation based concurrency control (GBCC) technology supports thousands of concurrent users with massive and constantly growing data. SAND delivers on the promise of sharing data throughout the Enterprise, providing instant access, driving decision-making, and ensuring the best information is in the hands of the right people at the right time.

    Sample Customers
    REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
    Information Not Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise20%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Warehouse
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infobright DB is ranked 27th in Data Warehouse while SAND [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Warehouse. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while SAND [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas SAND [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.