We performed a comparison between Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The stability is very good."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Datto Endpoint Detection and Response is a perfect product for endpoint security."
"The most valuable feature of Datto EDR is the visibility of the endpoints."
"The insight that the solution provides is the most valuable aspect. The security scanning they do is excellent."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and has good support."
"The solution does all that we expect it to do."
"I've mainly found the antivirus and antispyware features valuable. The documentation is okay as well."
"The most valuable features of this product include network isolation for machines and the ability to work with a consistent and defined set of virtual machines."
"A great feature of this solution is that it is very well-integrated with antivirus software. Other ADR solutions are implemented as single technologies and are not integrated with the provider, but Symantec offers AV plus ADR."
"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is stable."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to connect and global settings are good."
"The interface is quite easy to use."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The deployment of the solution right now is terrible. We find it to be very bad. It could be improved enormously."
"The solution should allow the automation of playbooks."
"The solution could improve by having more deployment methods."
"While they are quite dynamic, they need to ensure they are detecting threats faster in the future to keep people safer."
"It would be good if it can anticipate zero-day attacks. I don't know how it can be done and if it is even a feature of this product."
"They need to improve their cloud presence."
"One potential area for improvement in Symantec EDR is the reporting engine."
"The network forensics feature could be improved."
"It is not possible to buy it from the company itself, or resellers in other countries. If it is available, I see that it is offered as part of a larger service. For me, this was not suitable."
"Technical support is not as good as we expect, and resolving problems should be more timely."
"The solution’s scalability and stability could be improved."
More Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is ranked 44th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 3 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is ranked 24th in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) with 28 reviews. Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is rated 7.6, while Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) writes "Good security scanning, but has a complex setup and the stability isn't ideal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response writes "A highly stable and affordable solution for detecting and preventing security threats". Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Huntress and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. See our Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response report.
See our list of best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.