We performed a comparison between Infogix Data360 Analyze and Informatica PowerCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The drag-and-drop functionality makes it easy for business users."
"The support is valuable. There are also open-source ETL products, which work very well, but there is no support. When we face a production problem, being able to get support is valuable, and it brings efficiency. With an open-source solution, we can't engage anyone to resolve the problem as quickly as possible."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring tools and the reporting manager."
"It is easy to use, and it is quick for developing things. It is fairly powerful, and it can integrate with a lot of different platforms without much hassle."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica PowerCenter is the flow designer functionally. It is the best out of any ETL tool. Additionally, the solution is reliable and trustable in dealing with large data sources anytime. When we're using billions of data transactions, it's smooth."
"Informatica PowerCenter has been implementing mapping design, data flow, and workflow execution for years."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The greatest feature is that it is very easy to have someone come in and jump right in. It is one of the nicest tools in terms of getting a person acquainted quickly."
"The setup is straightforward."
"The memory processing needs to be improved because when you deal with a large amount of data, the interface tends to hang a little bit."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, considering the fact that the present licensing charges of the tool are expensive."
"Include more instruments for LOGs analysis, interpretation, and job corrections."
"Its licensing can be improved. It should be features-wise and not bundle-wise. A bundle will definitely be costly. In addition, we might use one or two features. That's why the pricing model should be based on the features. The model should be flexible enough based on the features. Their support should also be more responsive to premium customers."
"The performance of Informatica PowerCenter could improve."
"Some of the conversions are done inside the product. We use work tables that are created by the engine itself, but the names of the work tables are very long, and they don't have any meaning, which makes it a bit difficult to understand and follow exactly what is happening inside."
"The licensing cost for Informatica is very high. Other all-in-one solutions have much lower prices than Informatica."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve by having a single interface because half of the system is still in the legacy interface and many other elements are moved to the developer client. It would be good if there was a single interface for the end user and developers."
"It would be good to recreate the entire interface to make it easier for users to build workflows."
Earn 20 points
Infogix Data360 Analyze is ranked 52nd in Data Integration while Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews. Infogix Data360 Analyze is rated 7.0, while Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Infogix Data360 Analyze writes "Easy drag-and-drop interface and supports custom Python functions, but the performance needs to be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". Infogix Data360 Analyze is most compared with Alteryx Designer and Azure Data Factory, whereas Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.