Infor LX vs Infor M3 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infor Logo
1,501 views|1,253 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Infor Logo
4,252 views|3,363 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infor LX and Infor M3 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. Infor M3 Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software.""I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now.""Infor LX's most valuable feature is that it's very interactive.""One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated.""One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

More Infor LX Pros →

"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable.""The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development.""Infor M3 has tailor-made packages for each and every industry.""Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth.""It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it.""M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

More Infor M3 Pros →

Cons
"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved.""Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX.""It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time.""It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

More Infor LX Cons →

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3.""The solution must provide more learning documents.""It would be great if Infor added some new workflows in the finance module. I'd also like to see better integration with third-party applications.""The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end.""I would like to have some kind of dashboard to show an overview of different data on the same dashboard or on the same screen instead of moving to BI.""The implementation could be simplified, it's complex.""We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements.""The solution is stable but not agile."

More Infor M3 Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."
  • "Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."
  • More Infor LX Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."
  • "Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."
  • "The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."
  • "I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."
  • "If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."
  • "The tool’s licensing is yearly."
  • More Infor M3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated.
    Top Answer:Infor LX has a great strength but a great weakness too. Its strength is that it's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time… more »
    Top Answer:We run the solution on-premises but on a private cloud belonging to an IaC company. We have a remote connection to the private cloud. The organization Infor LX is installed for is a cable… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface and user experience were good.
    Top Answer:The solution must provide more learning documents. Researching and going through the configuration takes a lot of time. I took a lot of time on how to find the portals. It would be nice if more… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product for warehouse management.
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    1,501
    Comparisons
    1,253
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    510
    Rating
    7.3
    12th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    4,252
    Comparisons
    3,363
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    685
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Infor LN logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    SAP ERP logo
    Compared 42% of the time.
    Microsoft Dynamics AX logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    SAP ERP logo
    Compared 38% of the time.
    Infor LN logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    SAP S/4HANA logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Infor ERP LX, ERP LX
    Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3
    Learn More
    Overview
    Infor LX is a comprehensive process manufacturing system that covers various manufacturing methods, including made to stock, made to order, configure to order, assemble to order, batch, repetitive, flow, and Lean manufacturing. A wide range of industries—including consumer packaged goods, food and beverage, life sciences, medical devices, chemicals, automotive, and general manufacturing—trust Infor LX to improve performance and profit margins at a lower total cost than comparable solutions.

    Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

    Sample Customers
    Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko
    Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    University7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise42%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Infor LX vs. Infor M3
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. Infor M3 and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infor LX is ranked 19th in ERP with 4 reviews while Infor M3 is ranked 12th in ERP with 13 reviews. Infor LX is rated 7.2, while Infor M3 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LX writes "A robust solution with excellent support that needs to modernize its server technology". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infor M3 writes "The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP". Infor LX is most compared with Infor LN, SAP ERP and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas Infor M3 is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor LN, SAP S/4HANA, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP. See our Infor LX vs. Infor M3 report.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.