We performed a comparison between Infor ION and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We haven't had any issues with ION so far."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the ability to monitor integration performance and the reasons for the failure of inbound and outbound transactions. We can see both inbound and outbound transactions, and it gives us a mirror image or the whole history of all inbound and outbound transactions between Infor M3 Business Engine and the third parties."
"The tool's most valuable feature is middleware capabilities."
"ION is good for building custom middleware boxes."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"The solution is easy to use."
"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."
"ION's integration with older applications could be better."
"The dashboard is not very simple and can be a bit tricky."
"Infor ION doesn't provide connectors for all integration touchpoints. Sometimes, we may have to build our own. It incurs additional costs for the customer."
"I would like to see ION add automated setup and integration with Salesforce. They need to work on these types of tools."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
Infor ION is ranked 7th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Infor ION is rated 8.6, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor ION writes "It's bundled, so I don't need to purchase an additional product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Infor ION is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform and BizTalk Server, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator. See our Infor ION vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
