We compared SAP ERP and Infor M3 based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
SAP ERP is praised for its robust reporting capabilities, efficient supply chain management, and excellent customer service. However, users have identified a need for enhanced customization, a more intuitive user interface, and better integration with other systems. In contrast, Infor M3 is commended for its user-friendly interface, advanced reporting capabilities, and efficient inventory management. Users have highlighted the need for improved system speed and performance, streamlined user interface, stronger reporting and analytics capabilities, and seamless integration with other software applications.
Features: SAP ERP is known for its robust reporting capabilities and efficient supply chain management, while Infor M3 stands out for its user-friendly interface and advanced inventory management features.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for SAP ERP is well-received and reported to be manageable, ensuring a seamless implementation process. In comparison, Infor M3 also has a reasonable setup cost, making it easier for businesses to adopt the system and offering flexibility and transparency in their licensing model., The user feedback suggests that both SAP ERP and Infor M3 have positive ROI. SAP ERP is praised for its financial benefits and efficiency improvements, while Infor M3 is lauded for increased efficiency, productivity, streamlined processes, and cost savings. Users appreciate Infor M3's user-friendly interface and seamless integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: According to user feedback, SAP ERP could benefit from improved customization options, a more intuitive user interface, better integration with other software systems, and enhanced performance and efficiency. In contrast, users of Infor M3 have identified areas for improvement in system speed and performance, user interface navigation, reporting and analytics capabilities, and integration with other software applications. These enhancements would greatly enhance the functionality and usability of both products.
Deployment and customer support: Users of SAP ERP reported varying durations for the establishment of a new tech solution, with some spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. In contrast, users of Infor M3 emphasized the importance of considering separate timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation phases., Customers have found the customer service and support from SAP ERP to be excellent, emphasizing personalized attention and prompt resolution. Infor M3 also receives commendable feedback, with users praising promptness, effectiveness, knowledge, and friendly interactions.
The summary above is based on 48 interviews we conducted recently with SAP ERP and Infor M3 users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."
"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."
"The most valuable feature of Infor M3 is the level of detail it has about the different manufacturing processes compared to other ERP solutions. Other ERP solutions provide the same level of integration as Infor M3, but Infor M3 specializes in several functions, such as planning and manufacturing."
"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy."
"Infor M3 has tailor-made packages for each and every industry."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."
"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The features are very useful for finance."
"The best thing that SAP ERP has is the extensive coverage of processes for every field and business unit such as procurement, inventory, financials, asset management, plant maintenance, and production. We can cover up to 99.9% processes of our organization, which is the best thing about this solution. It also has a very good capability to integrate with other applications. The security and authorization level of SAP ERP is very high. No other solution can match this level."
"The solution is very mature."
"It is a utility-focused solution, and the deployment is very much aligned with utility service providers. If you look at the supply chain and the overall business model of a utility service provider, SAP is something that fits very well. That's because the company has invested tremendously in creating appropriate workflows pertaining to this segment or domain."
"Their tech support is always good."
"It is a stable solution...Our company has experienced a return on investment using the solution."
"SAP ERP has a good user interface with a lot of functionalities and good interface options."
"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."
"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."
"Infor should create one product to handle the whole business. At present, they make ERP systems for each type of business, and then sell additional features. I would like to have one system handing all organizations or all the business in deep ways and not have to buy additional features."
"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."
"The solution is stable but not agile."
"The solution must provide more learning documents."
"An area for improvement in Infor M3 is training. There should be more training resources available for clients. Clients also find it challenging to get consultants or integrators for Infor M3. The product doesn't have enough resources in the market to help clients."
"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."
"It would also help if it were more open, more flexible, with more standard products."
"Sometimes the cost is not reasonable, such as in the case of budgeting."
"It's difficult to code; structured language is difficult."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"More integrations and built-in integrations with other environments and products are needed."
"Technical support could be better."
"We will not make any major changes, and we are not expecting any enhancements or new features from SAP because they already have a new solution. No development is happening on SAP ERP because SAP has come up with a new version called SAP S/4HANA, which is memory-based technology. We are planning to upgrade to SAP S/4HANA, but we don't know when it will happen. We are in the preparation phase."
"I think that implementation could be simplified."
Infor M3 is ranked 12th in ERP with 13 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. Infor M3 is rated 8.2, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor M3 writes "The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". Infor M3 is most compared with Infor LN, SAP S/4HANA, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and Infor LN. See our Infor M3 vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
