We performed a comparison between Informatica Business Process Manager and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"The most valuable parts of this solution are the richness of its features and its easy interface."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"Its availability is very good."
"The dashboard on the homepage makes for an enhanced view at a glance of the various work functions applicable to the user."
"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
"This product is expensive and would be improved by lowering its price."
"The interface must be improved."
"MEGA HOPEX's initial setup could be easier. The newer version is better but they still need to improve the process. The deployment took approximately four to eight hours."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 5th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews. Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda and Oracle BPM, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Visio.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
