Informatica Business Process Manager vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Informatica Logo
572 views|512 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
443 views|259 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Business Process Manager and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Business Process Manager vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Kavish Dhingra
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn.""I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet.""There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Pros →

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

More OpenText MBPM Pros →

Cons
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone.""I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Cons →

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM.""There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

More OpenText MBPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."
  • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn.
    Top Answer:I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities.
    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    572
    Comparisons
    512
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    166
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    443
    Comparisons
    259
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Informatica BPM
    Metastorm BPM
    Learn More
    Overview
    Informatica Business Process Manager enables process automation and application integration (formerly called ActiveVOS) that integrates users, systems, and processes via purpose-built tools that both citizen integrators and developers can use.
    OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
    Sample Customers
    The Travel Company, Carbonite
    Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Mining And Metals Company15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Informatica Business Process Manager vs. OpenText MBPM
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Business Process Manager vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda and Oracle BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Informatica Business Process Manager vs. OpenText MBPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.