Compare Informatica Business Process Manager vs. Pega BPM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Use Informatica Business Process Manager? Share your opinion.
Andrzej Chmielarski
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""The best feature is the automation."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it.""I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Pros »

"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system.""The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners.""The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues.""It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly.""The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows.""The solution provides us with a very good dashboard.""The solution offers excellent workflows."

More Pega BPM Pros »

Cons
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Cons »

"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive.""Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved.""The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities.""Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout.""Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved.""We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies.""From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need.""There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."

More Pega BPM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Camunda is much cheaper.""I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive.""When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The price of this solution, including installation and configuration, is comparable to competing vendors.""The pricing is pretty good, compared to other similar products.""It's a user-based license where, as you scale the numbers of users, the price increases.""It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow.""The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.""We mostly have a yearly license.""The price is a bit expensive."

More Pega BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is operating well overall.
Top Answer: The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother. There should be quicker… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Informatica BPM
Pegasystems, SmartBPM
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

Informatica Business Process Manager enables process automation and application integration (formerly called ActiveVOS) that integrates users, systems, and processes via purpose-built tools that both citizen integrators and developers can use.

Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Informatica Business Process Manager
Learn more about Pega BPM
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
The Travel Company, Carbonite
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Computer Software Company30%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise26%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 17 reviews. Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 7.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "Enables us to build composite applications with BPMN 2.0 and BPEL". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, IBM BPM, Appian and Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM, Microsoft PowerApps and OutSystems.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.