We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Informatica Business Process Manager vs. WebRatio

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""It has an open BPM""The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""The best feature is the automation.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

More Camunda Platform Pros »

"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it.""I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Pros »

"The initial setup isn't too complex."

More WebRatio Pros »

Cons
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.""Lacking in forms visualization.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform.""The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex.""Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

More Camunda Platform Cons »

"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."

More Informatica Business Process Manager Cons »

"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."

More WebRatio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I use the open-source free version.""The open-source version of the product is free to use.""The cost of this solution is better than some competing products.""Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year.""We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost.""I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive.""When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition.""There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

More Camunda Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In a broad perspective when you compare Camunda & Bonita they have the below features: Camunda features: BPM… more »
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The initial setup isn't too complex.
Top Answer: The maintenance aspect is too heavy. Moving from one version to the other made the solution change, and not in a way… more »
Top Answer: My experience is related to doing analysis specifically on WebRatio. I make some analysis and evaluate it. I do not use… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
Camunda BPM
ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Informatica BPM
Learn More
Overview

Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.

With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.

Informatica Business Process Manager enables process automation and application integration (formerly called ActiveVOS) that integrates users, systems, and processes via purpose-built tools that both citizen integrators and developers can use.
In WebRatio we have been nurturing a true passion for developing enterprise-class software that exponentially increases the productivity and agility of our customers.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Informatica Business Process Manager
Learn more about WebRatio
Sample Customers
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
The Travel Company, Carbonite
Unicredit Leasing, Acer, Gruppo Torinese Transporti, A2A, SET Distribuzone, Dolomiti Energia, AIM Gruppo, IFC CNA_ Amsa
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company9%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise26%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Signavio, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2021.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review while WebRatio is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 7.0, while WebRatio is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "Enables us to build composite applications with BPMN 2.0 and BPEL". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebRatio writes "Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation". Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, Appian, Pega BPM and Signavio Process Manager, whereas WebRatio is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.