We performed a comparison between Informatica Business Process Manager and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Apache Airflow, Camunda and Oracle BPM, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Informatica Business Process Manager vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
