We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Test Data Management and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Test Data Management."The solution's scalability is high."
"One of the most valuable features is that I don't need to buy a subscription for any functionality. With Informatica Cloud Data Management, I have all the functionality and features available. If I need to make an integration, I can go to that integration service. If I need to mask, provide, or clean some information, I can easily just pick up that feature and use it. It's very simple, and I have all the functions and capabilities I need to work with data."
"The data quality is very good."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"Its cloud-based version has a few limitations compared to the on-premise version."
"One thing Informatica could improve is the way IPUs are used. Each customer purchases a certain amount of IPUs per month, but you can use more or less than that defined quantity. The only problem is if you don't use the all your IPUs, they don't carry over into the next month. I think customers should have the ability to transfer unused IPUs into the next month or year. This improvement could help give customers more flexibility, especially since cloud solutions need flexibility in how we use and pay for them."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"Everything is updated through forms, and working with UI web forms. It's more record-based processing. It is not mass-based processing. This is one of the things that are not good for TIBCO EBX. Another problem is we cannot join tables and prepare a view where the tables are joined. Someone can code it but it is not a feature of the solution without code. You have to take data from a table, combine it with data from another table and then present it. This could be done better."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
More Informatica Cloud Test Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is ranked 10th in Test Data Management with 2 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is rated 8.6, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Test Data Management writes "Has good stability and an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". Informatica Cloud Test Data Management is most compared with , whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM and Informatica PIM.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
