Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Persistent Data Masking and Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is data discovery. This is the most exciting feature for all of the banks.""The most valuable features are the structure masking and platform masking.""Informatica is user-friendly, stable, and scalable. These three aspects are the most valuable for us. If we can make it work well with the CRM, we can continue or try again this year to complete that part of the project. I am confident that this kind of solution is what we need because we have a third-party resource that works in the development.""Informatica provides a comprehensive solution for on-the-fly or real-time data masking.""Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Pros →

"It has the ability to stop any violation coming through via the database."

More Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Informatica's support understands the solution, but they lack the experience we need for our use case. That was one thing that we prioritized when we started searching for this kind of solution.""Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value.""Informatica should simplify the rules for setting classifications and user access management permissions. It's too complex to define, configure, and make work.""I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking.""The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Cons →

"It needs to detect more attacks and do more profiling of the database to learn its normal behaviors to sense violations."

More Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
6th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
303
Comparisons
179
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
544
Rating
7.0
Unranked
In Data Masking
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
Learn More
Overview

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

McAfee database security offers real-time protection for business-critical databases from all types of threats: external, internal, and even intra-database exploits. This software-based offering provides robust security, streamlined database security management, and continuous compliance without requiring architecture changes, costly hardware, or downtime.
Sample Customers
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company12%
Government7%
Educational Organization6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Data Masking
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 5 reviews while Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Masking. Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8, while Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] writes "It has the ability to stop any violation coming through via the database, but it should be able to detect more attacks". Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, whereas Sentrigo Hedgehog [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.