Compare Informatica Data Quality vs. Oracle Data Quality

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, SAS, Informatica and others in Data Quality. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I am impressed by the solution's interface.""We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality.""The solution is applicable for both technical and business users.""Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice.""It is very useful for testing purposes and designing mappings for small projects. If you go for IDQ in the mapping itself, you can see the data. You can then correct it, and test it so easily. It is working fine. It is also stable, scalable, and easy to deploy.""The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."

More Informatica Data Quality Pros »

"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and maintain."

More Oracle Data Quality Pros »

Cons
"Informatica is very expensive.""I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are.""The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved.""Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult.""It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it.""The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."

More Informatica Data Quality Cons »

"If the length of time required for deployment was reduced then it would be very helpful."

More Oracle Data Quality Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The vendor needs to revisit their pricing strategy."

More Oracle Data Quality Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing.
Top Answer: I believe licensing is around $700,000 annually and we pay around $300,000 for support. The licensing is tricky because sometimes we need to pay for additional connectors and those are hidden costs… more »
Top Answer: The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration.
Top Answer: Once it is set up, it is easy to use and maintain.
Top Answer: There are some challenges with respect to standardization, matching, segregation, and merging. Our technical team has not found this to be problematic but it has been reported by some of our… more »
Top Answer: We are a system integrator and software solutions company, and Oracle Data Quality is one of the solutions that we use to provide services. In a multiple-system integration scenario, there is data… more »
Ranking
3rd
out of 41 in Data Quality
Views
2,360
Comparisons
1,488
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
7.7
7th
out of 41 in Data Quality
Views
377
Comparisons
213
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
686
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Datanomic
Learn More
Overview

Deliver high-quality clean and trusted data with an enterprise class data quality and governance solution that scales, regardless of size or format or data, platform, or technology.

Oracle Enterprise Data Quality delivers a complete, best-of-breed approach to party and product data, resulting in trustworthy master data that integrates with applications to improve business insight.
Offer
Learn more about Informatica Data Quality
Learn more about Oracle Data Quality
Sample Customers
Condé Nast, Tani, U.S. Xpress Enterprise
Roka Bioscience, Statistics Centre _ Abu Dhabi , Raymond James Financial inc., CaixaBank, Industrial Bank of Korea, Posco, NHS Business Services Authority, RWE Power, LIFE Financial Group,
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, SAS, Informatica and others in Data Quality. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Data Quality is ranked 3rd in Data Quality with 7 reviews while Oracle Data Quality is ranked 7th in Data Quality with 1 review. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while Oracle Data Quality is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Works well and has a good interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Quality writes "Easy to use and maintain, integrates well, and can handle any type of data". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, SAP Information Steward, IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer, Ataccama ONE Platform and Microsoft Data Quality Services, whereas Oracle Data Quality is most compared with .

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.