We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I am impressed by the solution's interface."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"The solution is applicable for both technical and business users."
"Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"It is very useful for testing purposes and designing mappings for small projects. If you go for IDQ in the mapping itself, you can see the data. You can then correct it, and test it so easily. It is working fine. It is also stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are."
"The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it."
"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."
"Informatica is very expensive."
Deliver high-quality clean and trusted data with an enterprise class data quality and governance solution that scales, regardless of size or format or data, platform, or technology.
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 3rd in Data Quality with 7 reviews while SAP Data Quality Management is ranked 10th in Data Quality with 1 review. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while SAP Data Quality Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Works well and has a good interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Quality Management writes "Has good scalability, it is easy to add new products". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, SAP Information Steward, IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer and SAP Data Services, whereas SAP Data Quality Management is most compared with SAP Information Steward, SAP Data Services, Precisely Trillium, Experian Data Quality and Ataccama ONE Platform.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.