Informatica Dynamic Data Masking vs Informatica Persistent Data Masking comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Dynamic Data Masking and Informatica Persistent Data Masking based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Informatica Dynamic Data Masking?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Ranking
12th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
282
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
303
Comparisons
179
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
544
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
Learn More
Overview

Informatica Dynamic Data Masking de-identifies data and controls unauthorized access to
production environments, such as customer service, billing, order management, and customer engagement. Dynamic Data Masking masks or blocks sensitive information to users based on their role, location, and privileges, can alert on unauthorized access attempts, and provides logs for compliance and audit.

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

Sample Customers
Hastings, AARP, ACE Hardware, ACH, Addivant
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization48%
Financial Services Firm17%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company12%
Government7%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise54%
Large Enterprise39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Data Masking
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Dynamic Data Masking is ranked 12th in Data Masking while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 5 reviews. Informatica Dynamic Data Masking is rated 0.0, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". Informatica Dynamic Data Masking is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Privitar Publisher and Protegrity Data Security, whereas Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.

See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.